Re: [kitten] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis-03: (with COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 30 November 2016 05:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50825129D2A; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 21:13:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t03YvEL29QGw; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 21:11:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3345A129590; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 21:11:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.21] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id uAU5BhJN015006 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 23:11:44 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.21]
From: "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "Benjamin Kaduk" <kaduk@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 23:11:42 -0600
Message-ID: <A4D8CD68-8E75-48E0-9BF2-830D0A090903@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <20161130045434.GG8460@kduck.kaduk.org>
References: <148048048257.11619.7306478398508550011.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161130045434.GG8460@kduck.kaduk.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5310)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/oqaH4NFyPxiOdbYKoG1Exte71Cw>
Cc: mrogers@redhat.com, kitten@ietf.org, kitten-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [kitten] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 05:13:42 -0000

On 29 Nov 2016, at 22:54, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:34:42PM -0800, Ben Campbell wrote:
>> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis-03: No Objection
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> - 4.3, 2nd paragraph: Absent what sort of other information? That's a 
>> bit
>> vague for a condition for a MUST.
>
> Presumably, something like an acknowledgment from the client that it 
> is
> willing to assume the loss of privacy.

Would it make sense to drop the phrase?  (If this is a pre-bis leftover, 
that's fine.)

>
>> -9: Isn't Sam an author? :-)
>
> Yes :)
> Well, Sam was an author of 6112 and is included here because the 
> document
> is hardly changing.

To be clear, I did not mean to object to Sam's authorship--I was just 
checking to make sure the acknowledgement of an author was on purpose.

Ben.