Re: [kitten] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis-03: (with COMMENT)

["Ben Campbell" <[e-mail]>]

On 29 Nov 2016, at 22:54, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:34:42PM -0800, Ben Campbell wrote:
>> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis-03: No Objection
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> - 4.3, 2nd paragraph: Absent what sort of other information? That's a 
>> bit
>> vague for a condition for a MUST.
>
> Presumably, something like an acknowledgment from the client that it 
> is
> willing to assume the loss of privacy.

Would it make sense to drop the phrase?  (If this is a pre-bis leftover, 
that's fine.)

>
>> -9: Isn't Sam an author? :-)
>
> Yes :)
> Well, Sam was an author of 6112 and is included here because the 
> document
> is hardly changing.

To be clear, I did not mean to object to Sam's authorship--I was just 
checking to make sure the acknowledgement of an author was on purpose.

Ben.