Re: [kitten] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis-03: (with COMMENT)

On 11/29/16 10:11 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> On 29 Nov 2016, at 22:54, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:34:42PM -0800, Ben Campbell wrote:
>>> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>>> draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis-03: No Objection
>>>
>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> COMMENT:
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> - 4.3, 2nd paragraph: Absent what sort of other information? That's 
>>> a bit
>>> vague for a condition for a MUST.
>>
>> Presumably, something like an acknowledgment from the client that it is
>> willing to assume the loss of privacy.
>
> Would it make sense to drop the phrase?  (If this is a pre-bis 
> leftover, that's fine.)

Thanks for your comments.

This text is pre-bis and I also interpret this text in the same context 
as Ben Kaduk has.

Shawn.
--
>>
>>> -9: Isn't Sam an author? :-)
>>
>> Yes :)
>> Well, Sam was an author of 6112 and is included here because the 
>> document
>> is hardly changing.
>
> To be clear, I did not mean to object to Sam's authorship--I was just 
> checking to make sure the acknowledgement of an author was on purpose.
>
> Ben.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kitten mailing list
> Kitten@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten
>