Re: [L2tpext] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-v6-tunnel-yang-02.txt

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Fri, 28 October 2016 13:36 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C5D12949F for <l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 06:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.952
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.952 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UgIgkJTtfqAm for <l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 06:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE0A9129473 for <l2tpext@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 06:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3576; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1477661779; x=1478871379; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=gh04eBDm4Vzrhio8T9xqFOa683svXXPG3d2677AmBbs=; b=VjTI51bHLhX+NfJJJIY4m1v0OJZBvZc6Zyu/S1lz3yO/1qQXu/8PhKN+ XDHS2eC904ObmMkW5rNYLmFF5+2JJtVJq3Yq2m4iY7n3o4rT/rKZ7E20E icfoffIgD9XuKFdcY3uWkzgQM/bqbrgUeF9Lkribz6si4uJyIFJTH8R5D o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AZAQCpUxNY/40NJK1bGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBgyoBAQEBAR9YfQeNL5Z/lD+CBx0NhS9KAhqBXj8UAQIBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BYh0LhGIBAQEDAQEBASAROgkCBQsCAQgYAgImAgICJQsVEAIEDgWITAgOsSiMc?= =?us-ascii?q?gEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARyBB4U2gX2CWIRHF4JtLIIvBY5MhW6FXgG?= =?us-ascii?q?GLIl6gW5OhB+DOoVvhx6FcYQAAR42X4NPgTtyAYZpgQkBAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,410,1473120000"; d="scan'208";a="340623514"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 28 Oct 2016 13:36:18 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-017.cisco.com (xch-rtp-017.cisco.com [64.101.220.157]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u9SDaIFL016436 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:36:18 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-017.cisco.com (64.101.220.157) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:36:17 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:36:17 -0400
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: "ian.farrer@telekom.de" <ian.farrer@telekom.de>
Thread-Topic: [L2tpext] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-v6-tunnel-yang-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSMPbrbpM5QLlI606Jeyb5scpWr6C+IaMA
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:36:17 +0000
Message-ID: <F7641219-3A48-4F35-B351-1BA91F833D38@cisco.com>
References: <147764356272.24948.16837477966660147078.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <05FADFF5-5D7D-482A-856E-8E8C7AD1091D@telekom.de>
In-Reply-To: <05FADFF5-5D7D-482A-856E-8E8C7AD1091D@telekom.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.241.119]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <79E89CEBA6FC63429C390372706A96A8@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2tpext/eF9Wz2y0vVot1GM4P1dvVmLjQJ0>
Cc: "l2tpext@ietf.org" <l2tpext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [L2tpext] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-v6-tunnel-yang-02.txt
X-BeenThere: l2tpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol Extensions <l2tpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2tpext>, <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l2tpext/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2tpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext>, <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:36:21 -0000

Thank you, Ian, for this update.

Looking at the L2tpext list, there has not been significant discussion of this document — before a last-call, it may seem we need a first-call :-)

WG,

I would encourage you to read this document and comment on the list.

Authors,

I was just wondering — wouldn’t we need an L2tp YANG model, before a Keyed-v6-tunnel one?

Thanks!

— Carlos.

> On Oct 28, 2016, at 4:40 AM, ian.farrer@telekom.de wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We’ve just submitted a new version of this draft. This is a small update which cleans up some outstanding items:
> 
> • Updated the YANG model to YANG 1.1 (the model content and structure was already compliant, so this only required addition of the ‘yang-version 1.1’ statement
> • Small language cleanup
> • Completion of the IANA Considerations section
> 
> The model has been checked against yangvalidator.com and reports ‘No warning or errors’.
> 
> The authors believe that this draft is now ready and would like to request WGLC.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ian
> 
> 
> On 28/10/16 10:32, "internet-drafts@ietf.org"; <internet-drafts@ietf.org>; wrote:
> 
> 
>    A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-v6-tunnel-yang-02.txt
>    has been successfully submitted by Ian Farrer and posted to the
>    IETF repository.
> 
>    Name:		draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-v6-tunnel-yang
>    Revision:	02
>    Title:		A YANG Data Model for Keyed IPv6 Tunnels
>    Document date:	2016-10-28
>    Group:		l2tpext
>    Pages:		14
>    URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-v6-tunnel-yang-02.txt
>    Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-v6-tunnel-yang/
>    Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-v6-tunnel-yang-02
>    Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-v6-tunnel-yang-02
> 
>    Abstract:
>       This document defines a YANG data model for the configuration and
>       management of Keyed IPv6 tunnels.  The data model includes both
>       configuration and state data.  Due to the stateless nature of keyed
>       IPv6 tunnels, a model for NETCONF notifications is not necessary.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>    Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>    until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
>    The IETF Secretariat
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> L2tpext mailing list
> L2tpext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext