IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-ra-pref64-07.txt> (Discovering PREF64 in Router Advertisements) to Proposed Standard - PLC consistency

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 08 November 2019 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B015120123 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 01:00:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dgrfx0U1c6dj for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 01:00:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C2A2120111 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 01:00:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id xA890RDY021693; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 10:00:27 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id CD9722056B5; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 10:00:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB83205429; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 10:00:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id xA890RNV010858; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 10:00:27 +0100
To: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Cc: last-call@ietf.org
References: <157296542741.4445.12665220429941271779.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <e3305598-9db3-a7ef-5c54-9d85bb97e401@gmail.com> <CAFU7BAQ80mxVykDJT1de0qmhcMwtKoffcARu6gwrxf9OSJL5cA@mail.gmail.com> <5dd15779-41ee-29a2-ded7-5743e23902c4@gmail.com> <03e6a389-60a4-e6cd-2f96-e98e1a52f7ac@gmail.com> <CAFU7BATg87Efqi4q+xXEf9p3J=b8FaUw3K+mdpCLZpvmW4JD0g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <01efa004-555f-8df4-aef4-ef9b23f50394@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 10:00:27 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFU7BATg87Efqi4q+xXEf9p3J=b8FaUw3K+mdpCLZpvmW4JD0g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/DUZJhwK1Cqs55y_jxy8dxf6kNxk>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-ra-pref64-07.txt> (Discovering PREF64 in Router Advertisements) to Proposed Standard - PLC consistency
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 09:00:32 -0000


Le 08/11/2019 à 02:54, Jen Linkova a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 12:40 AM Alexandre Petrescu
> <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On one hand, I fully agree: RFC6275 does not formally update RFC4861:
>> there is no "Updates:" tag in its front page.  In that sense one might
>> think about requesting an Errata for adding such a tag, in the DMM WG.
> 
> Submitted:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5898
> 

I thank you.

Alex

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email