[Ldap-dir] Re: [ldapext] Review of draft-wahl-ldap-subtree-source
Leif Johansson <leifj@it.su.se> Thu, 07 June 2007 02:11 UTC
Return-path: <ldap-dir-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hw7Th-0000Vw-Mo; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 22:11:57 -0400
Received: from ldap-dir by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HrbHq-0005sl-On for ldap-dir-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 25 May 2007 11:01:02 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HrbHq-0005sc-Es; Fri, 25 May 2007 11:01:02 -0400
Received: from smtp1.su.se ([130.237.162.112]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HrbHp-0001Bt-5c; Fri, 25 May 2007 11:01:02 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.su.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A4674353; Fri, 25 May 2007 17:00:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp1.su.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.su.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27745-01-24; Fri, 25 May 2007 17:00:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.0.0.11] (ua-83-227-179-169.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [83.227.179.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp1.su.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6333974279; Fri, 25 May 2007 17:00:56 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4656FA33.6000608@it.su.se>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 17:01:07 +0200
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@it.su.se>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070403)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt.Zeilenga@Isode.com>
References: <D893844B-47EC-4973-A23A-64FB851DA5F1@Isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <D893844B-47EC-4973-A23A-64FB851DA5F1@Isode.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at smtp.su.se
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.312 tagged_above=-99 required=7 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.312]
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 22:11:55 -0400
Cc: Ldapext <ldapext@ietf.org>, Mark Wahl <Mark.Wahl@informed-control.com>, Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@Sun.COM>, ldap-dir@ietf.org, apps-review@ietf.org
Subject: [Ldap-dir] Re: [ldapext] Review of draft-wahl-ldap-subtree-source
X-BeenThere: ldap-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Directorate <ldap-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldap-dir>, <mailto:ldap-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ldap-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldap-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldap-dir>, <mailto:ldap-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ldap-dir-bounces@ietf.org
Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
> I reviewed this draft on behalf of the Apps Area Review team and the
> LDAP Directorate.
> Such reviews have no special weight in the IETF. That is, this
> message should be
> treated simply as comments from an IETF participant.
>
> Summary: This document specifies an directory attribute to publish the
> "source" of
> directory entries.
>
> Directory entries often do derive from other sources. An entry could
> easily derive
> from multiple sources. Having a standard attribute that holds
> reliable source
> information seems to useful. However, I wonder if it appropriate to
> have an
> attribute which has "subtree" scope. I would think an attribute with
> "entry"
> scope would be better.
>
In practice I'd say entries are typically derived from multiple sources.
Attribute or
even value scope would be ideal imo but that may be impractical. I
definitely agree
that subree scope is too blunt a tool.
Cheers Leif
_______________________________________________
Ldap-dir mailing list
Ldap-dir@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldap-dir
- [Ldap-dir] Review of draft-wahl-ldap-subtree-sour… Kurt Zeilenga
- [Ldap-dir] Re: [ldapext] Review of draft-wahl-lda… Leif Johansson