Re: [ldapext] draft charter comment

Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com> Fri, 27 October 2017 08:16 UTC

Return-Path: <michael@stroeder.com>
X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B1613AB2B for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 01:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PZJt2Au-SoGT for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 01:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from srv1.stroeder.com (srv1.stroeder.com [213.240.180.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24A8413942F for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 01:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.hv.local (mail.stroeder.local [10.1.1.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.stroeder.local", Issuer "stroeder.com Server CA no. 2009-07" (not verified)) by srv1.stroeder.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 862CD810; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:16:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from nb2.stroeder.local (nb2.stroeder.local [10.1.1.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail1.hv.local (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60AEC97; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:16:09 +0200 (CEST)
To: Ludwig Krispenz <lkrispen@redhat.com>, ldapext@ietf.org
References: <1509061159.20220.91.camel@redhat.com> <02ca8531-454c-4034-1402-346a299c331c@highlandsun.com> <59F2DE48.6050905@redhat.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Michael_Str=c3=b6der?= <michael@stroeder.com>
Openpgp: id=43C8730E84A20E560722806C07DC7AE36A8BC938
Message-ID: <13c3dc67-b3c2-64f6-afae-d6df27a485e0@stroeder.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:16:09 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <59F2DE48.6050905@redhat.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms050607060802080809030108"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ldapext/rVupV9y5ySs5cyKFEmokB3N5kgY>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] draft charter comment
X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group <ldapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ldapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:ldapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 08:16:12 -0000

Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> [..] what I am missing is the topics of
> extending ldap transactions and sync repl - as we discussed in Edinburgh

Ludwig, could you come up with some text describing this as concrete
work items? Then we can discuss whether to add that or not.

Ciao, Michael.