[lemonade] [Errata Rejected] RFC4978 (4478)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 19 September 2015 22:31 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: lemonade@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lemonade@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5241B3001; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 15:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6ZzQ_U5_5Uo7; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 15:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F5A1B2FF6; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 15:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id AEF7B18046A; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 15:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
To: poima.fuimaono@gmail.com, arnt@oryx.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20150919223036.AEF7B18046A@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 15:30:36 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lemonade/07BgCZvR6zKLHRrKEl78-FevfkI>
Cc: lemonade@ietf.org, barryleiba@computer.org, iesg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [lemonade] [Errata Rejected] RFC4978 (4478)
X-BeenThere: lemonade@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service enivronments <lemonade.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lemonade/>
List-Post: <mailto:lemonade@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 22:31:20 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC4978, "The IMAP COMPRESS Extension". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4978&eid=4478 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: poima fuimaono <poima.fuimaono@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2015-09-19 Rejected by: Barry Leiba (IESG) Section: IMAP protoco Original Text ------------- RFC 4978 vs. RFC 5032 -- mismatch in UPDATES clauses Within two weeks, two RFCs have been published specifying amendments to the IMAP protocol: o RFC 4978 -- COMPRESS o RFC 5032 -- WITHIN Search Both IMAP extensions are similarly structured and arguably RFC 4978 modifies IMAP behaviour specified in RFC 3501 (and other IMAP extension specifications: IMAP TLS and SASL) to a much greater extent than RFC 5032 does. Nevertheless and surprisingly, only RFC 5032 has the line, Updates: 3501 in its document header and hence in its RFC index metadata. This is apparently inconsistent. An update to the RFC metadata incoporating the relation "RFC 4978 updates RFC 3501" would be welcome as well. Report New Errata Corrected Text -------------- TBD following modifications Notes ----- Both IMAP extensions are similarly structured and arguably RFC 4978 modifies IMAP behaviour specified in RFC 3501 (and other IMAP extension specifications: IMAP TLS and SASL) to a much greater extent than RFC 5032 does. Nevertheless and surprisingly, only RFC 5032 has the line, Updates: 3501 in its document header and hence in its RFC index metadata. This is apparently inconsistent. An update to the RFC metadata incoporating the relation "RFC 4978 updates RFC 3501" would be welcome as well. Report New Errata --VERIFIER NOTES-- First, errata isn't meant to be used for RFC metadata. Second, the reason that RFC 5032 "updates" 3501 is that the grammar for the IMAP SEARCH command isn't set up to be extensible, so adding search terms is an update to the base. In contrast, adding IMAP commands generally isn't. Except that, yes, we have been inconsistent with that over time. -------------------------------------- RFC4978 (draft-ietf-lemonade-compress-08) -------------------------------------- Title : The IMAP COMPRESS Extension Publication Date : August 2007 Author(s) : A. Gulbrandsen Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service environments Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [lemonade] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4978 (4… RFC Errata System
- [lemonade] [Errata Rejected] RFC4978 (4478) RFC Errata System