Re: [Lime] Mid-point review questions for LIME YANG doctors review
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 07 March 2017 11:25 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1ED5129625; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 03:25:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3_zil6c4YaEM; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 03:25:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A4C6129432; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 03:25:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10187; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1488885920; x=1490095520; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=RZObXKT0zese/dfKDm7nMmBUPmBiInObEhGoeH9GmL0=; b=nHGHvqz2S5u9d9I4O0WxI/7VySM3hSqAwwqVZxpKo/A2ZxJ9YW56CclO S1u75uVj/vjfCgTYfPAUuVi21cMblpACFUxre7lOOTb2NceIqLqjQrAU5 5QOA1r9zFCqRgWIiLV6P/56vAnuTCUbNcDYXRTflUaC5XMj21Ji1IrDeN A=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,258,1484006400"; d="scan'208,217";a="653073384"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Mar 2017 11:25:17 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.87] (ams-bclaise-8916.cisco.com [10.60.67.87]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v27BPHci030427; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 11:25:17 GMT
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, "Carl Moberg (camoberg)" <camoberg@cisco.com>
References: <85BDDA43-9271-46FB-9498-C449509B873D@cisco.com> <1CD1B57F-C654-4DAE-92AF-8084B8D6FCE6@cisco.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <01100c64-6347-697c-9e64-91cd7fb0b1cd@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 12:25:17 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1CD1B57F-C654-4DAE-92AF-8084B8D6FCE6@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------E7E02F6A22A2EBC7DDB90C48"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/SNHxqv94BvnNhvmXC5oCBeszeqo>
Cc: "draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model.authors@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model.authors@ietf.org>, "lime@ietf.org" <lime@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model.chairs@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model.chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Lime] Mid-point review questions for LIME YANG doctors review
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 11:25:22 -0000
Dear all, [copying the mailing list for visibility] How is this progressing? I'm really hoping for updated drafts before the Internet draft submission cut-off next Monday. Regards, Benoit > Many thanks, Carl! > > I am on vacation the week of March 6th, but please do not let that > stop you. > > Please let me know if there is anything I can help with (logistically > or technically) in the mean time. > > Thanks, > > — > Carlos Pignataro, carlos@cisco.com <mailto:carlos@cisco.com> > > /“Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make > myself sound more photosynthesis."/ > >> On Feb 23, 2017, at 6:56 AM, Carl Moberg (camoberg) >> <camoberg@cisco.com <mailto:camoberg@cisco.com>> wrote: >> >> Authors, Chairs, >> >> >> I am in the middle of my duties as the assigned YANG doctor for: >> draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam >> draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods >> draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model >> >> I have come across a couple of high-level items that I would like to >> discuss with the authors. It’s based on the reasonable likelihood >> that I don’t understand the subject matter at hand, but need some >> clarification to move on. >> >> I think my main point is that while the drafts lay out and partly >> describes the content of the YANG modules, it does not describe how >> to use them. There seems to be an assumption (and that’s my question) >> that the client developer consuming the YANG understands the general >> concepts and the ordering between configuring the nodes . In the same >> vein, it seems to me that the drafts are a little short on the >> general terms. And while I don’t think we need to repeat general >> terms and names from other specifications, I do think it’s worth >> thinking through if the reader is assumed to be familiar with e.g. >> 'test point', 'fec', ‘md’ or if we need a brief description of those >> and other fundamental terms. These are things that could be captured >> and included in an applicability statement. >> >> I was thinking to start with these high level questions from myself, >> before diving into the more detailed feedback. Hope this makes sense. >> >> I would like to suggest a webex/conference call, of course taking >> everybody's busy schedule into account. >> >> I am out of office next week, but have setup a doodle to find a date >> in the week after next: >> http://doodle.com/poll/rwic8844bvntezsr >> >> If none of the suggested slots work, let me know and we’ll look at >> other options. >> >> -- >> Carl Moberg >> Technology Director, NFV >> camoberg@cisco.com <mailto:camoberg@cisco.com> >> >
- Re: [Lime] Mid-point review questions for LIME YA… Benoit Claise