IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Fwd: #202719 - Re: LISP EID prefix 2001:5:3::/48

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Thu, 01 August 2019 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF92E1200E5 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 11:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zZ1cizy_px9H for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 11:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 557D6120059 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 11:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id t14so32579947plr.11 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 11:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=YhXyFG5i2oj2BjDuQvrx59WOX35OxSStMmH1A2AjJjI=; b=U9qJtmj+GE8Nxk3dtuqqL7jJTJYhWBaIZDt7txYC5XyvkEdZZ2OaLWYBfBTvF/xYpB Lt8vBwOIdON4HHcFkLnWsRe+os+CvloJOCMSc62M4zagVJLfRTkeSYv02Ku6vJ0ztufA mYn/G9ywEd8jnHDhFCKfxVU3V9DwhfHGeXvc8r0OlnPRdpR3PzB34Axhkb/CgIompNm/ sChrWepHaMDbDeED/eujaqlgTf2NORWxTk1k4PEZefgC1Wm+LrFtdEV5lfGldTL658gL WCC+LqFnTp00KcVOM743X+EiW6A32N79QX/UyOYgK46+8/RL3xitRdllsnhxq9byz9vZ 3QTg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=YhXyFG5i2oj2BjDuQvrx59WOX35OxSStMmH1A2AjJjI=; b=NUS6YY4/f5693S4KKl4635aaKae4N0ZZWHkG/KJj89QniS4NTCcd0MqU6Nln2awLhH EYGmDSlDofzuZh98loEJ+8asrUtDpMA+zttBglwg2py/eZNyfue9Pe2zPffTN9ak+/uR iYIghSzqOUrpVPYG5nPKVD/2h6utjlRHHzrPPOsbXP6CsGCW7uv8gvMUIfTt2mw7bC2k uxDsHE/XdnLhBCyy38/ETj+wUfa/UpzzDEIcgntTgWIYZQrsMuOegQmgcqtvx3f0vAlv NadIK0iKXma1HQi4F/3oYugBQRArUkqTUE3qsVmX1X9vOip0iOL8tWkkKorroOlJDrND SZtQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU1YTvVy9lC6hoUoYaH3ABCYk+Oj+O328K3qn5WW4MngoxAOfIU bk4R1cuDoQUBu6Hs4Hs8Okk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxnbHg2dJmo4cF3Abh33qpC51XNhRRMakgyDbpjtLeTNeqD7xXZTGifZXfPvVxV7KYaSPc8iw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7781:: with SMTP id o1mr127367543pll.205.1564685473830; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 11:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.97.50.122] ([96.72.181.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f7sm71178415pfd.43.2019.08.01.11.51.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Aug 2019 11:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b5d32bdc-e065-ae08-6c1c-c1a94bc0eac0@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 11:51:12 -0700
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1A6037C9-6F43-40AC-9160-7E5B937800B4@gmail.com>
References: <PMZV6QQO6Q_5d42d66523a09_980c3f7f75ebcf24284095_sprut@zendesk.com> <547CDFBA-E4CB-4422-890C-A8CC895C0F62@gmail.com> <7193daf7-8c2f-31f9-14b5-e8548e9330ec@joelhalpern.com> <CCA2E6B2-141C-49FA-A5E9-482307F0420B@gmail.com> <97c6dce6-ae82-9706-743d-519fcd00c837@joelhalpern.com> <62350D10-4641-4DB9-8FEE-065ACF0A160D@gmail.com> <b5d32bdc-e065-ae08-6c1c-c1a94bc0eac0@joelhalpern.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/Mzlwx1Zzem8qZFKd1tY_OyA1kP4>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Fwd: #202719 - Re: LISP EID prefix 2001:5:3::/48
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:51:16 -0000

> We asked for an experiment.  As such, we need to re-evaluate the experiment.

That is my point.

> You said "I am using it".   As I said, I presume that is a mis-statement.  Who is using EIDs from that block?  What are they being used for?  Is having a block actually helpful?

I am using EIDs out of the subblock that RIPE allocated to me. I have renewed the block each year. I can’t tell you who are using them without their permission. They are being used to be on an IPv6 overlay. They are being used with some structure in the address as well as crypto-EIDs.

Yes, having the block is useful. Especially was we will have a requirement to have these EIDs interwork with IPv6 Internet nodes.

> In particular, given that our focus as a working group has moved away from Internet-Wide deployments of LISP to more specialized use cases, it is not at all clear that the PS-to-be documents warrant the allocation.

I can’t see why it would be harmful to ask for another 3 years.

Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email