[lisp] Questions on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-mobility-00.txt
Yue LI <yueli.cnfr@gmail.com> Thu, 03 August 2017 15:51 UTC
Return-Path: <yueli.cnfr@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC611323BB for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 08:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2YNUXiemjti3 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 08:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x231.google.com (mail-pg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07A271323B4 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 08:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x231.google.com with SMTP id v77so7790656pgb.3 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 08:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WXBu761dcgBDF0bxzRTV8HH6hp6rzzS0iZg2rJDOh3c=; b=X4CGkgjbfKBubQWDiYd8vMllrbz4Eq/A50Smj01pnLH52pBNVB/Oxz/RJVre7tHKbq EsYzmsqQuIyW3pe7KpqrVFzHVg77U8odA8BfU7steYQfakXyl8dZLOMUsL5j0ONDReSj ywqxEmNNkYS4YvMiNk/0kvR8hVzrqnGVL0WUKZu5Dyw3xGoCdxunSNgDBLRk4spVOlgE /KM7621O9uIHktzoysSnepn4P+7hbB4ARDb82Xb5v++RFEi9c9OHXKLPO24I2kM6eoX3 s7kjGqQLOtXDtHjIHBitxjsK+fOuhUfa05kZzB3M9ZGSNtoX3/YuvpATE5FqjvpKFwKK z2oA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WXBu761dcgBDF0bxzRTV8HH6hp6rzzS0iZg2rJDOh3c=; b=BtBA/LURXHviQ167RX4wXl/8SOv1t2dzSaGH+mkpJWXjBxLptbIaWAuw3qqSIwSext RmA+JQT9kaykJEJV+L0/c0muIZ0k5QbPOgxXBJAh69JDgJZplNYAylGYJwCZDW835ylZ iPlCk33YBMlS0Cmx+tghqz1HUn97QMQnBm12UCShzpOXe8Bcxp5k41tJN8OCwcYHfSGr f+bmCgu4jZLVXWP/DN9pBZjSRNnPj/8ONQ0yMCyD2vVYPC8OWHy8r1+mRbCXVgWs6evK vJmCsCFALJRnMAOzbmkuzEVX4WOvu6KHFXHxrv25maZWedaWjzOeW05f/Q+RBqf8vfrL VwQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110L+3dpraGF/n24dWujU+rlPyuC2fwP749LWDxrZWdT2tJsPhDS 5IWC2R01cwsLBv/1oPfmHtMIJkpehd67
X-Received: by 10.98.201.202 with SMTP id l71mr2050628pfk.223.1501775482440; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 08:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.168.164 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 08:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Yue LI <yueli.cnfr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 17:51:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CAASoLj2nQccwb3L1a52+72qhrU+i44C-vqsUJT_gGBU80FqBTg@mail.gmail.com>
To: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c18a15e29d1320555db5aa0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/fH1stIEABD52wLeYZkMuGErDYJs>
Subject: [lisp] Questions on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-mobility-00.txt
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 15:51:25 -0000
Dear lispers, One question on L3 Mobility in the draft-ietf-lisp-eid-mobility-00.txt <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-eid-mobility-00>. How the 1st sequence of the packet flow (1st paragraph on Page 7) can be achieved please? The Device 1 keeps its EID=1.0.0.1, but the prefix of Site D is 2.0.0.0/24. Since 1.0.0.1 is not belongs to 2.0.0.0/24. How the packets can be exchanged between xTR D and Device 1? Waiting for your explanations and many thanks. Best regards, -- Yue LI PhD student, Telecom ParisTech Tel: +33 (0)661091840 E-mail: yueli.cnfr@gmail.com