Re: [lmap] LMAP Result Correlation

"Carey, Timothy (Nokia - US)" <timothy.carey@nokia.com> Tue, 02 February 2016 12:59 UTC

Return-Path: <timothy.carey@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857891B2A89 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 04:59:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O_Dpl2xaLxmc for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 04:59:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-us.alcatel-lucent.com (us-hpswa-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.18.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B70761B2A88 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 04:59:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from us70uumx3.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.18.15]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 4A81296EC643C; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:59:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from us70uusmtp3.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70uusmtp3.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.65]) by us70uumx3.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u12CxA9J021819 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:59:10 GMT
Received: from US70UWXCHHUB02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70uwxchhub02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.49]) by us70uusmtp3.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u12Cx9Em023019 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:59:09 GMT
Received: from US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.10.82]) by US70UWXCHHUB02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.49]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 07:59:09 -0500
From: "Carey, Timothy (Nokia - US)" <timothy.carey@nokia.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Thread-Topic: [lmap] LMAP Result Correlation
Thread-Index: AQHRWT1zdQZ+9uOJak2nQiJ7JPqUTZ8P9GBggAD43ICAACJXcIAFX9OAgADGywCAAFZ3kIAAZGgAgADN0BA=
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 12:59:08 +0000
Message-ID: <9966516C6EB5FC4381E05BF80AA55F77012A5B609F@US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <9CB9C91CE0CC0E42AA376AE9DE7A4DF17AC588F9@AMEXMB01.ds.jdsu.net> <20160127140429.GB56525@elstar.local> <9966516C6EB5FC4381E05BF80AA55F77012A5B1903@US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <20160128082904.GA1957@elstar.local> <9966516C6EB5FC4381E05BF80AA55F77012A5B2139@US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <CAP67N=ZS58r6qoLQsrx695BE3_EDR+RMcwjjxWn5dqxPgDP6dw@mail.gmail.com> <20160201082746.GB10733@elstar.local> <9966516C6EB5FC4381E05BF80AA55F77012A5B5748@US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <20160201193636.GA12248@elstar.local>
In-Reply-To: <20160201193636.GA12248@elstar.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.5.27.18]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/WQOesCvLBZ5XrkHCqagT4AlsahU>
Cc: "alissa@cooperw.in" <alissa@cooperw.in>, Ron Stana <ron.stana@viavisolutions.com>, "lmap@ietf.org" <lmap@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lmap] LMAP Result Correlation
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 12:59:15 -0000

Juergen,

Oh - I am sorry then - I missed that this point. 
I wouldn't have an issue with a correlation point on the scheduled action - that is where the options are.

BR,
Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: EXT Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de] 
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 1:37 PM
To: Carey, Timothy (Nokia - US)
Cc: Ron Stana; alissa@cooperw.in; lmap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lmap] LMAP Result Correlation

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 06:47:49PM +0000, Carey, Timothy (Nokia - US) wrote:
> Juergen and Ron,
> 
> My comments in line <TAC>
> 
> 
> > If this understanding is correct, then to retrieve the results from 
> > the collector for either Schedule A or Schedule B seems to require 
> > unique tag to be specified with the schedule instead of the task.  The 'options'
> > object for the schedule could be used, however it would be more 
> > symmetrical to allow a tag for the schedule since the value would be 
> > sent to the collector in the 'tag' object of the report.
> 
> I agree that we should allow the definition of additional tags in the action configuration. Tim might have suggested this as well but I was not sure, see my other email.
> 
> 
> <TAC> Again it is the schedule action that would have the option - I am looking at draft-07 of the information framework section 3.7.2.
> The report has the scheduled action options in the ma-report-task-object section 3.6.2 so I don't understand the comment for the need in the schedule...
>

Tim,

we are talking about tags, not options. A tag is the YANG representation of what is called the cycle-id in the information model. In contrast to the information model, the YANG model allows a set of tags and not just a single one.

  The ma-task-obj has a ma-task-cycle-id of type string in the
  information model. In the YANG data model, we have instead a list of
  tags (and one of the tags can carry a cycle identifier. This allows
  us to have multiple tags for a given task.

  The ma-report-task-obj has a matching ma-report-task-cycle-id in the
  information model. In the YANG data model, we have again a list of
  tags.

  In order to distinguish reports from a given task kicked by different
  actions, the proposal was made to have the ability to define a tag or
  cycle-id in addition as part of the ma-action-obj.

I suggest to align the information model here with the YANG data model.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>