[lmap] A question about running actions in sequence

Fredrik Kers <fredrik.kers@netrounds.com> Tue, 16 May 2017 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <fredrik.kers@netrounds.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE90128768 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 May 2017 08:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.802
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.802 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AC_DIV_BONANZA=0.001, BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netrounds-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i9O-1QjW2C2c for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 May 2017 08:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22f.google.com (mail-wr0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 645C712EAF4 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 May 2017 08:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id l50so79288588wrc.3 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 May 2017 08:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netrounds-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=LhGcVTwlv499UAMBzMsaLZIeB27O0uf9bCYRfw8sbUk=; b=x7tAJDB5kEs7vgoB/tRRmTvYfjAT0kfXanGmyhMDfSsYFHv7HewAkkdHBmTqd5pjLV uuxsSOokmxQNq88+h2w8pvb5S47fGOhyQ2mKP7sRSjEo8cyIcVa6paaO8ccS/V1LFWra S3fELB6y4MDLm64NXbZF6iu5zCWp/IjV8vf3LQs+G786Xs5seU0JbwmDFldUfhrK49r1 vre8cwt5yIryzHHot0pdJDfk+c+DJvhKe5SwsSRdNxBVR1e0FrnYTxRROKijS8r2yT1X jQiehl1UsQqc+XsNzz7mu9MZoNzUES45b4H8ch+DcSpj0XYoN6oXmfEYdYpoE5FHaDlY XfaA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=LhGcVTwlv499UAMBzMsaLZIeB27O0uf9bCYRfw8sbUk=; b=nfGc5qG4va4h9QaPhIamwEiMrNFRfGpojRxJd+Aq3AQryZGEozy9/oWKj/0Ot0z2c6 WIzBDVwaymuNfwxDA+q4fJ2+d87FbYkBtiOJtdrgWCeH9cPcQtv0Xh+dL4Wb4EYoiikv OpBj/BwRzxkqRdEqoR4EQYD24rhLsfnQg2+J7berSIjPPAzEZLXs8LygcRinx0DTGMuD GwoNK6Ngn4cpkBRFd5IDQahJsGKfLhSU31hRZUbTCtGzN7XJvoZj73Zo82y4PejNwoOR cKk8F44Grk48p5NSKjye7CdczScT1z97F+vLBuX2Xbv3MIflUw4aUYpsMfh3x1lVAWBA ZYHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBVb8+pADtljprUaGd/J2JjUrDJtFq0Up+SPPTcX66CYBe8fva1 2FHX5s9AZ4j2FWn2pVU9C199oeg3Kw==
X-Received: by with SMTP id v6mr7857793wrb.60.1494948936651; Tue, 16 May 2017 08:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2017 08:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fredrik Kers <fredrik.kers@netrounds.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 17:35:36 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKkp-KTaAgvDQSZQEybjx_1AX8qytctg6PCNzSckpEW+2A8Awg@mail.gmail.com>
To: lmap@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045d5af053d370054fa5ec8f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/YbjtZmlvG8gzi8kXrWnXY6UMpJw>
Subject: [lmap] A question about running actions in sequence
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 15:39:29 -0000


I have a question about how running Actions in sequence is supposed to work
according to the LAMP information model.

Let's take a simple example. Say you have two actions that you want to run
in sequence, first a traceroute that finds all routers between the MA and a
remote peer, and after that a time limited ping to each of the routers.

It will not be possible to use the Schedule's duration to do the time
limiting of the ping since there is no way to have a second Schedule (doing
the ping) starting after the first Schedule (doing the traceroute) is

Also, you can not place both Actions in the same Schedule and use the
Schedule's duration since you don't know how long time the traceroute will

The only way that I see is to make it possible to configure the duration in
the ping Actions itself. Is this how it's intended to be done? The
possibility to schedule arbitrary actions in a sequence would be quite
limited by this I think.


*Fredrik Kers* | CTO
*Netrounds* | Storgatan 7 | 972 38 LuleƄ | Sweden | www.netrounds.com