[lmap] no meeting at IETF 101 (?)
Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> Sun, 21 January 2018 11:52 UTC
Return-Path: <dromasca@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35D512778E for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 03:52:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LjfqXZdOtu4C for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 03:52:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x233.google.com (mail-qt0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0F66120721 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 03:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x233.google.com with SMTP id a27so1144736qtd.1 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 03:52:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=I2PlF3QhmnxdMIvNoCJECpq2lhamKSJNrXiKTdOd8Z4=; b=E4DQoF6p6e7jqIEOe1PKl93EnaeSGBfEXcViCubX39AKxrxwRFfn3/bIockwwRDlan 3AMi0x2Nu9tfIoquM+7cz9ofYmkHo0aaPPT+KxTqOQQd43eruuAwfqdwhaXQzlOmIr84 108Fl1uMi6NSLJUiSqv15B4dKQ9IusrYaNMAzIcAeoIrevxLUBQjbjhkgsKaTDvTinpM wBiPmvtpJP79KsRDgCSgM8mzuTFWMeaH5bPvuX7oJR1JOPssNLfv3ou69jiymT14BiyE 8xbjxcB4QQlXmbhGXXLdp920xCl2nfqncYLcxBrA/pfi47p++jdTRTA2oWd8IOQj8HB8 2s1Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=I2PlF3QhmnxdMIvNoCJECpq2lhamKSJNrXiKTdOd8Z4=; b=lGfXYt5Gr6HMNdtiOUpHuYZWBhqFzw9ASA0RX7zTPeJxeRxOk59ICijykBAOsuXhzz l5JyuH6DUlV7IZujjfVahTlw02n2y7UArdFI2yug/tRWVRy3fMNVnS6PHAkV9/Rb5ybr 1sMfh6yVi9W8KUZjb0F8nm2oDZEhEXO0gMoA/uGEJOSK/VnSsiYcIc3rPFh39r+YkzWs Yh1DhqqHn8t7j3BMIRr1YKSDa5rNJP8qdII/IRQJ6z9JklMR9zkR7vNxkz0zLp+9roAA eTNRtTxuv4rA3OKsnnZ1ymtYWUlCm/Uh1Zgxm0M30Czs6YN87ODXQ1mGO8u38jMezoG1 fc8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytf5tkczzbg+WqtKea4zrM0t0Bi/RA9wLS9mh0KtO3OPJLMMdJYi XXdeCfYj8QS7y1cCuxBH5qyHe0+l7wn3dt0DSaM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225HAXsuiLp9Nfqk5AIbSpD3Vs4fV2TpHNACoP23iggw4Q+MC3hEg/ZsX4tTbXC3nVbe+1UXO714JOT4Tn2HEyo=
X-Received: by 10.200.58.36 with SMTP id w33mr6283236qte.76.1516535539676; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 03:52:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.23.147 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 03:52:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:52:19 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFgnS4WJfUM7Hj7Ff5xAzQv-uDwEN3_4MdL04chONia77EOqkw@mail.gmail.com>
To: lmap@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c062a7c21b870056347f218"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lmap/l5n9K3IHlE5rJeSGJgtGX-CDWbM>
Subject: [lmap] no meeting at IETF 101 (?)
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:52:23 -0000
Hi, There has been no activity lately on the mail list, and I am not aware about any new proposals. It does not seem that there is any need for lmap to meet at IETF 101. Please let know the WG mail list of any other opinions before Monday 1/29. If there are no requests or comments I will push the 'no meeting' button. Thanks and Regards, Dan
- [lmap] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Dan Romascanu