IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lp-wan] feedback on SCHC CoAP

ana minaburo <ana@ackl.io> Tue, 01 October 2019 07:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ana@ackl.io>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF33B1200B6 for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 00:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P6Pp72y_lH_i for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 00:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe34.google.com (mail-vs1-xe34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 855911200A1 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 00:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe34.google.com with SMTP id v19so8638445vsv.3 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1SaPbRrJhHOfQ21cjvLTDF15vRKbZClmUAfcMAfOg8Q=; b=izSPB//MtXa89klg/X9C0ffl+nKamd6d3Oq5bjCThQup2Kcv6xEjsCHzdGSllqlgl/ 2ycSgv6JMVmPAbgDq/8qTbSLeaOdWyyu3BS1PpPPjLiqfZVseGz2Vif3DPg0ii/uwais rfeBSe3bmSykDCt6taAuoHb0oYVVEgplCpa0Z9mh0VOYPpevmZvlJky8wRmxLG+uB8vq 8sVDBLsVMGp73vrZwJ30LeDR7vM/syc2ZajRLns7bIXHHOhEYQOotgfYJjcwFs/9hMrI SMH6aRerIex1xFdBPAs+WY7sIH+u8JAjaJudVLgM9TIlzc79Ns4RmDW53harPkdtP6jW kP/Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1SaPbRrJhHOfQ21cjvLTDF15vRKbZClmUAfcMAfOg8Q=; b=Ego8/syMK5eiIWi8SQbj5R6NlCtsLO8RGPcvbet6s5jFv+5T7HptvTSotT2hCM6T+X MlL+keVf6y09mTsPeaeAywPBqMuUIeNGxSQUD+3cUNEmbRqBXhNTDs7xLCjJePye9oK6 Cll3l6V5FJ9pDwVKZV0moQh59LKYLmHjcYrrpDndyBpN2Sf5yvibIElYnaJN1KF75SVY 6UQUFnGZG5LFivPyatDef+ZBU2+ega9t+vHF6VhBiJHPt8qb2Ekkzmlaw3Yk2+SyqxWl MQputikMP7Efx/QuLUfsR7KKM6PDDTaVvquKaG6XL+l6MtBgpHjMZSOPsU2uH7ate7yT 9PwA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX96HDV5JXmA9WMJvvejUoKxrAgVR8oUWSTgRbdE7eZFjkE13H+ xOsJCHafgbBj3fSXjvqhjAMfLNgJNC62jhMNuwd/rA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzkQyOYG9SZESBIUW+xpX6toGVkf1Xpkn7tE8WXqVUfe5rEelGrIfGdXhNWzqgKL1pCAwsrx6+tbDsJVeyUTpY=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:c297:: with SMTP id k23mr11598150vsj.31.1569913877397; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:11:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MN2PR11MB35657EB347F4ADF557E17DC3D8810@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB35657EB347F4ADF557E17DC3D8810@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: ana minaburo <ana@ackl.io>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 09:10:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAbr+nSyjmz=SH0iyxKYz=PYjtUS99Mh0Tic3SCt0yA+7BRX9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Cc: lp-wan <lp-wan@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-context-hc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-context-hc@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-coap-context-hc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-coap-context-hc@ietf.org>, "lpwan-chairs@ietf.org" <lpwan-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fd9d390593d40e3b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/AJzuxdKCtxnI6er4jQnwHDo98gs>
Subject: Re: [lp-wan] feedback on SCHC CoAP
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 07:11:22 -0000

Dear Pascal,

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"

Ana

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:45 PM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:

> Dear all :
>
> We are looking for feedback on SCHC COAP for the publication process.
>
>
> Authors: please confirm that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures
> required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have
> already been filed. If not, explain why. If you are not aware of any such
> IPR please answer with "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this
> draft"

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email