Re: [lp-wan] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-context-hc-21: (with COMMENT)

<dominique.barthel@orange.com> Sat, 02 November 2019 10:34 UTC

Return-Path: <dominique.barthel@orange.com>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6FC1201EF; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 03:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zujxRBGBqY1o; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 03:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF8DA12010E; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 03:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr00.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.64]) by opfednr27.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 474wQr1Vpyz4xT8; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 11:34:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.32]) by opfednr00.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 474wQr0BPNzDq7S; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 11:34:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCAUBM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::d42b:2e80:86c2:5905]) by OPEXCAUBM7C.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 11:34:11 +0100
From: dominique.barthel@orange.com
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-context-hc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-context-hc@ietf.org>, Pascal Thubert <pthubert@cisco.com>, "lpwan-chairs@ietf.org" <lpwan-chairs@ietf.org>, "lp-wan@ietf.org" <lp-wan@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-context-hc-21: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVkWkQTfw5wXoRE0CGhi0pRySSrw==
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:34:10 +0000
Message-ID: <12583_1572690852_5DBD5BA4_12583_184_1_D9E319BB.6B59D%dominique.barthel@orange.com>
References: <156643579552.25773.13769866708821790148.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156643579552.25773.13769866708821790148.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.3.170325
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.245]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <261672C61F525244AA9783CD2F13D3B5@adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/LOK97e5nQeBMBeZDqMgctWotEnM>
Subject: Re: [lp-wan] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-context-hc-21: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:34:28 -0000

Hello Alissa,

Thanks again for your time reading and commenting on this draft.
We have just published -22, in which we have addressed all the IESG review
comments.
In particular, we have made RFC8376 normative, as you suggested.
Best regards,

Dominique

Le 22/08/19 03:03, « Alissa Cooper via Datatracker » <noreply@ietf.org> a
écrit :

>Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
>draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-context-hc-21: No Objection
>
>When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
>The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-context-hc/
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>COMMENT:
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Please respond to the Gen-ART review.
>
>It seems as though RFC 8376 should be a normative reference given its use
>in
>the terminology section.
>
>


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.