Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label Depth Using IS-IS" - draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Mon, 02 September 2019 10:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B7B120123; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 03:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rFS1YgAJT5P5; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 03:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4488120129; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 03:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=958; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1567419102; x=1568628702; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=USZAH+IG+gY1G6fP5NnieAxJ2HgsjZWHGCZoiRsB7jM=; b=UKh9FBhUZkzVMMH1g+Sao6e0ceKnYIZAOKaKhZzKC+pc/PzBx3efqR/u tKJ3sbY2Fe50mNmcl8lZb6K/gnIOtHyAVFssJVhNPVt0r1YSW8DqSmYTj MHYD9hqy1xVp3r8LuYtflPSV2ZS5iljgo1NtdR7lEym7cI9+S/GL3oz2J 4=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,457,1559520000"; d="scan'208";a="16263349"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 02 Sep 2019 10:11:40 +0000
Received: from [10.147.24.38] ([10.147.24.38]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x82ABd80028382; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 10:11:39 GMT
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc@ietf.org>
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
References: <0356E1FE-51EC-4C58-BC64-B64B9430171B@cisco.com>
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <61bf8493-6c62-a798-8f6a-ace122e53ac7@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 12:11:39 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0356E1FE-51EC-4C58-BC64-B64B9430171B@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.147.24.38, [10.147.24.38]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/nDvj1xi8fo-OgxLKUhiaY2dYkcc>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label Depth Using IS-IS" - draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 10:11:45 -0000

Hi Acee,

I'm not aware of any IPR.

thanks,
Peter

On 30/08/2019 21:11, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Authors,
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07?
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> 
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond
> 
> to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any
> 
> relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing
> 
> list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a
> 
> response has been received from each author and contributor.
> 
> If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> 
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of
> 
> any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Acee
>