Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-04 Shepherd review

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Mon, 09 July 2018 09:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FAE4130F44; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 02:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W-pXFy7lIaML; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 02:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D145130DD0; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 02:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2065; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1531127666; x=1532337266; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=p11LIVYa29k5OTafntGFdiG/muCoxwkdrYveI/M50PQ=; b=K4nOWxIGHlUNX1w02uIAO4x1r4hamxVzAC/YK0Qv7MaCIZRTPhXQdhVL 0FP0xb0LjUCFikrc3BtXfyNm9toHcG0bBNP58jQrffdKanPD74R1SbjAO JdBaCSZXGoIImgAzpukShKQA04qE9XCRQ407wyMpvQUaYkVbvFCotTHQx g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0B6AQDyJkNb/xbLJq1bGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAYUYEoQiiGONW5VGgWYLhGwCgmI4FAECAQECAQECbSiFNwE?= =?us-ascii?q?FIw8BBUABEAsYAgIFFgsCAgkDAgECAUUGAQwBBwEBhRyodYIODoRcg2mBOoE?= =?us-ascii?q?LiTk/hB6EQiCDGYJVAodiigiHZQmPJIgWhUeSEIFYIYFSMxoIGxWDJZBTPY9?= =?us-ascii?q?rAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,329,1526342400"; d="scan'208";a="5058188"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jul 2018 09:14:24 +0000
Received: from [10.147.24.38] ([10.147.24.38]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w699ENRn015947; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 09:14:23 GMT
Message-ID: <5B43276F.2040405@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2018 11:14:23 +0200
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>, "draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id@ietf.org>, "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
References: <6FD38147-EA21-4336-B436-1072BF449DE2@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <6FD38147-EA21-4336-B436-1072BF449DE2@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/uN4iGir2Zlcv7lXyLM2WpQjUbG4>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-04 Shepherd review
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2018 09:14:29 -0000

Hi Yingzhen,

thanks for your review.

As regards to first IDNITS warning, not sure about the first one, I took 
the section "Requirements Language" from RFC8395 as suggested by Loa. 
RFC2119 is only referenced there, that should not be a problem though.

I removed the reference to ISO10589.

thanks,
Peter

On 09/07/18 00:41 , Yingzhen Qu wrote:
> Dear authors,
>
> I have done shepherd review of draft-ietf-ospf-lls-id-04 as requested by
> LSR chairs. I’d like to thank all authors for their contributions on
> this document, also people who have reviewed this document and provided
> valuable comments and discussions.
>
> The document is well written and ready for publication.
>
> IDNITS check found a couple of nits:
>
>    Miscellaneous warnings:
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>    ** The document contains RFC2119-like boilerplate, but doesn't seem to
>
>       mention RFC 2119.  The boilerplate contains a reference [BCP14],
> but that
>
>       reference does not seem to mention RFC 2119 either.
>
>    -- The document date (July 1, 2018) is 7 days in the past.  Is this
>
>       intentional?
>
>    Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>       (See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative
> references
>
>       to lower-maturity documents in RFCs)
>
>    == Unused Reference: 'ISO10589' is defined on line 200, but no explicit
>
>       reference was found in the text
>
>       '[ISO10589] International Organization for Standardization,
> "Intermed...'
>
>    -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'BCP14'
>
>    -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'ISO10589'
>
>       Summary: 1 error (**), 0 flaws (~~), 1 warning (==), 3 comments (--).
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yingzhen
>