Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-04 Shepherd review

[Peter Psenak <[e-mail]>]

Hi Yingzhen,

thanks for your review.

As regards to first IDNITS warning, not sure about the first one, I took 
the section "Requirements Language" from RFC8395 as suggested by Loa. 
RFC2119 is only referenced there, that should not be a problem though.

I removed the reference to ISO10589.

thanks,
Peter

On 09/07/18 00:41 , Yingzhen Qu wrote:
> Dear authors,
>
> I have done shepherd review of draft-ietf-ospf-lls-id-04 as requested by
> LSR chairs. I’d like to thank all authors for their contributions on
> this document, also people who have reviewed this document and provided
> valuable comments and discussions.
>
> The document is well written and ready for publication.
>
> IDNITS check found a couple of nits:
>
>    Miscellaneous warnings:
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>    ** The document contains RFC2119-like boilerplate, but doesn't seem to
>
>       mention RFC 2119.  The boilerplate contains a reference [BCP14],
> but that
>
>       reference does not seem to mention RFC 2119 either.
>
>    -- The document date (July 1, 2018) is 7 days in the past.  Is this
>
>       intentional?
>
>    Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>       (See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative
> references
>
>       to lower-maturity documents in RFCs)
>
>    == Unused Reference: 'ISO10589' is defined on line 200, but no explicit
>
>       reference was found in the text
>
>       '[ISO10589] International Organization for Standardization,
> "Intermed...'
>
>    -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'BCP14'
>
>    -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'ISO10589'
>
>       Summary: 1 error (**), 0 flaws (~~), 1 warning (==), 3 comments (--).
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yingzhen
>