[marf] FW: secdir review of draft-ietf-marf-as-14

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Sun, 22 April 2012 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FAAC21F85BD for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.645
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.645 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DVrTYqtMOS69 for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cloudmark.com (cmgw1.cloudmark.com [208.83.136.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C714621F85B6 for <marf@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com ([72.5.239.26]) by mail.cloudmark.com with bizsmtp id 18RF1j0010as01C018RFRe; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:25:15 -0700
X-CMAE-Match: 0
X-CMAE-Score: 0.00
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=RaES+iRv c=1 sm=1 a=QMZKka45TBd+hNGtXG2bIg==:17 a=ldJM1g7oyCcA:10 a=Pengzl89C0IA:10 a=zutiEJmiVI4A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=Luyob8o-JWSPInQ5tZMA:9 a=IWT6-9QyXVzm_wxHthYA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=QMZKka45TBd+hNGtXG2bIg==:117
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas902.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::54de:dc60:5f3e:334%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:25:15 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "marf@ietf.org" <marf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: secdir review of draft-ietf-marf-as-14
Thread-Index: AQHNILUFN9gIoi+juUCedEwXL/ocrZanSplQ
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:25:14 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280FE93D@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [67.160.203.60]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280FE93Dexchmbx901corpclo_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudmark.com; s=default; t=1335126315; bh=LvQfSXpjhwHxfmPMucx1DwSiZdvlKLBBx9lZwaDV+0U=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=xGkhBqh9dgH0EpWZaaze8gH/E93QmI6OUo86HuAYdOHEy7PTQ+b2GU+dat+3hob9y PNTAb7/zSkjWuD5zxqVE2NjBMt30r0KFeuOotU6+1vu2g5/3oGDa43YLZrDq2mfchE pLTXBawOSR6UCKho+RlD+WxmvOgt5g36ZjD3q4tI=
Subject: [marf] FW: secdir review of draft-ietf-marf-as-14
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:25:16 -0000



      
          
--- Begin Message ---
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

The Abuse Reporting Format (ARF) is used to report email abuse feedback between email operators, or from email operators to end user network access operators. This document is an applicability statement for using the ARF in these two contexts.

The security considerations section refers the reader to the security considerations discussions in RFCs 5965 and 6449, but also contains a detailed discussion of various concerns. I see no security issues with this document.

--- End Message ---