Re: [marf] Proposed changes to draft-ietf-marf-as

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Wed, 25 April 2012 15:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3135121F8794 for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RTtq6EV9muSx for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C123721F8782 for <marf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (69-196-144-227.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26A641ECB41C for <marf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:16:50 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:16:47 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: marf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20120425151642.GD60024@mail.yitter.info>
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928101C5B@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <5386985.GhKIFnpsVj@scott-latitude-e6320> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928102204@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <5301521.gxfVyjcsls@scott-latitude-e6320>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5301521.gxfVyjcsls@scott-latitude-e6320>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [marf] Proposed changes to draft-ietf-marf-as
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:16:51 -0000

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:08:52AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> don't think it's necessary to have a list of all currently possible values to 
> satisfy the requirement to accept all types.

In that case, it's a preposterous MUST requirement.  What that really
means is "accept anything", not "accept all types".

Best,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com