IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MBONED] draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Fri, 03 February 2012 08:46 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C624A21F8539 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 00:46:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.161, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oTI9OuaDWcKE for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 00:46:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias91.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043E421F852B for <mboned@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 00:46:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omfedm06.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.2]) by omfedm11.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 786D73B4055; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:46:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from PUEXCH11.nanterre.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.101.44.27]) by omfedm06.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 60E7C27C053; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:46:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.7]) by PUEXCH11.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.27]) with mapi; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:46:47 +0100
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, MBONED WG <mboned@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:46:47 +0100
Thread-Topic: draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format
Thread-Index: Aczg+qpfXnRMN2TbRYCfyf6mdJ5MfwBVIfXg
Message-ID: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35BC45AEEDB@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D7649263B0@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
In-Reply-To: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D7649263B0@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.395186, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.2.3.53314
Subject: Re: [MBONED] draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:46:50 -0000

Dear Ron, all,

IMHO, the document is stable. I vote for issuing a WG LC just after publishing the -00 of the WG adopted version.

Cheers,
Med 

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : mboned-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mboned-bounces@ietf.org] 
> De la part de Ronald Bonica
> Envoyé : mercredi 1 février 2012 17:01
> À : MBONED WG
> Objet : [MBONED] draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format
> 
> Guys,
> 
> It appears that we have consensus to adopt 
> draft-boucadair-64-multicast-address-format as a WG item. 
> Since it is such a short document, do you think that it would 
> be appropriate to have a WG last call before IETF 83?
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------
> Ron Bonica
> vcard:       www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> MBONED@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
>

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status