Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files?
Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> Mon, 05 November 2018 22:26 UTC
Return-Path: <pere@hungry.com>
X-Original-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B8B124D68 for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 14:26:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d3yIcSAqyRNT for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 14:26:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bouvier.getmail.no (bouvier.getmail.no [84.210.184.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80D77124C04 for <media-types@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 14:26:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bouvier.getmail.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F77F4002E; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 23:26:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bouvier.getmail.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bouvier.get.c.bitbit.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id XDskbGLT4xKf; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 23:26:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bouvier.getmail.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362204002F; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 23:26:24 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bouvier.get.c.bitbit.net
Received: from bouvier.getmail.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bouvier.get.c.bitbit.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id X9bs8BVXXa2x; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 23:26:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hjemme.reinholdtsen.name (cm-84.212.222.24.getinternet.no [84.212.222.24]) by bouvier.getmail.no (Postfix) with SMTP id 050A94002E; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 23:26:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: (nullmailer pid 17839 invoked by uid 10001); Mon, 05 Nov 2018 22:26:23 -0000
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
To: media-types@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CANfjZH1COMnjN9jAJGssneP9JymWdo-YmUq93RWu6MxEzBQcEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <sa67ehyzo3s.fsf@meta.reinholdtsen.name> <20181031102655.GI17721@w3.org> <c419db69-9677-3467-c777-7758450a55fd@henke37.cjb.net> <CANfjZH1COMnjN9jAJGssneP9JymWdo-YmUq93RWu6MxEzBQcEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 23:26:23 +0100
Message-ID: <sa6h8gvw48g.fsf@meta.reinholdtsen.name>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/media-types/mCIb5ZrIyqT519x1fd8acaW1gPM>
Subject: Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files?
X-BeenThere: media-types@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IANA mailing list for reviewing Media Type \(MIME Type, Content Type\) registration requests." <media-types.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/media-types>, <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/media-types/>
List-Post: <mailto:media-types@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/media-types>, <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 22:26:34 -0000
[Eric Prud'hommeaux] > That depends on the levers we have available. I was assuming that we > can't change the deployed media type to get rid of the "x-". It > appears that some of the tooling makes that not too problematic > because it has infrustructure for aliases. I'm all in favor of getting > rid of "x-" when possible. It's possible the right thing to do is to > register all four (or maybe only one of text/{diff,patch} and > gradually migrate the tooling (a non-trivial task as i've been seeing > tools DTRT with patches for decades). A dual registration reflects > both current and intended reality, which is arguably its purpose. I do not understand the way forward from here. Can someone who know the process bring some clarity? Who make decisions? Who are just making comments on the sideline? What am I supposed to do now to try to get a registered mime type for patches? -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen
- [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Petter Reinholdtsen
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Eric Prud'hommeaux
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Petter Reinholdtsen
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Clemens Ladisch
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Julian Reschke
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Petter Reinholdtsen
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Henrik Andersson
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Petter Reinholdtsen
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Julian Reschke
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Eric Prud'hommeaux
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Petter Reinholdtsen
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Petter Reinholdtsen
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Mitar
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Petter Reinholdtsen
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Mitar
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Julian Reschke
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Petter Reinholdtsen
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Mitar
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Petter Reinholdtsen
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Mitar
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Mitar
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Edwards, Thomas
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Petter Reinholdtsen
- Re: [media-types] Mime type for patch files? Mitar