Re: [MEDIACTRL] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6505 (3659)

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Wed, 19 June 2013 16:06 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Original-To: mediactrl@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mediactrl@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C40921F921F for <mediactrl@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.98
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nZ2V3-UhutGe for <mediactrl@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls6.std.com [192.74.137.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF19D21F922A for <mediactrl@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (root@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r5JG3xMo011146; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:04:01 -0400
Received: from shell01.TheWorld.com (localhost.theworld.com [127.0.0.1]) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id r5JG3s2l6954369; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:03:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from worley@localhost) by shell01.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id r5JG3lHe6945849; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:03:47 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:03:47 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <201306191603.r5JG3lHe6945849@shell01.TheWorld.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley)
To: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
In-reply-to: <C9ECF127-9CE6-4A24-8E2E-535CB8AB3380@standardstrack.com> (eburger@standardstrack.com)
References: <20130617142221.B0A8262113@rfc-editor.org> <C9ECF127-9CE6-4A24-8E2E-535CB8AB3380@standardstrack.com>
Cc: timm@rainwillow.com, chris@ns-technologies.com, joelrepiquet@gmail.com, mediactrl@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Re: [MEDIACTRL] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6505 (3659)
X-BeenThere: mediactrl@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media Control WG Discussion List <mediactrl.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mediactrl>, <mailto:mediactrl-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mediactrl>
List-Post: <mailto:mediactrl@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mediactrl-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mediactrl>, <mailto:mediactrl-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:06:36 -0000

> From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>;
> 
> Looks like a good editorial catch. Others?

Given that the existing reference ("Section 15.1 of [RFC6230]") points
to the acknowledgments section of the RFC, it seems like a good idea
to correct it!

Dale