[mif] New Charter Items

Margaret Cullen <margaretw42@gmail.com> Wed, 02 March 2016 12:24 UTC

Return-Path: <margaretw42@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B0B1B2B72 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 04:24:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MOJSou4bY1lB for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 04:24:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x233.google.com (mail-yk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C8511A1BC9 for <mif@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 04:24:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id v186so1503917yke.2 for <mif@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 04:24:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date:to :mime-version; bh=KnEOtnoTdx7eZ/hzDt7drJXeHMys4JlG3l/HjRbSOWw=; b=kil9Lvlw6uBaq3Z+I+PdA2QwEbS8b6J9ASEUGF7f1Zm5o2vdC8/AXjTUGOPltoDY/4 zKNVxCNroK3F/4b98BTKdq4NI3XsDv3vf+CedpWYCuK+T8+xXqrNnxGDmYcnYlMR7wLc iNAfSxb9Kd7x6rN+qCNRXEWse5zq2KsdXdZNLXSLMP/jSwq91aB1PB/KU4GOjRcZ0mBa CXa35jfqzRTQEtIkqV17ybeKJHwG64+DVLn32YfuDsyeR1tCNTJFY/FoeL5MWW06hDf9 AzGxkeu2RAsPPkL4oGxoaGJaKDOINF1V9ks5yNuSP6Fq06lApjIglewP9/GWz4SC9mJQ Kh7Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:content-transfer-encoding:subject :message-id:date:to:mime-version; bh=KnEOtnoTdx7eZ/hzDt7drJXeHMys4JlG3l/HjRbSOWw=; b=PzCvwrNsom/3/xfdXAXCxfT/EIw4VaWf3+6b7OKfiuoSUafxAztv9R4bIW/CE4b7Lb r47iJhMXnvUkWcAM2L32pAgXgbJCidPmW3ynNy0jvXoUw9RBq+L3GrNO3AH95/duZXz4 DkayUyDF7/CH5h0eQ/Jj0B9TAW+eNruQN44e4jhQ0+poCcR4V2SRpJPubyGMLFP/HTJg ZES5uELIldj8aCcTNCYvYIuq/qdKTZxo/OAgwd5xw5iHBgIqf6Yry6aSwegxpZnGDquv iXDiUK8XkuBkKmIOxWl51VYQmdwoezesFluN4LF54oyamZJVq7Lxv1Gj7XfieOXfXwli gfqA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKkztNFm+VpdFPZ86z1ZITE7K0UlkfHJrN5N3eFFCrou66tVQH4lgV9cR3TAGWIkw==
X-Received: by with SMTP id p9mr14589596ybb.81.1456921487579; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 04:24:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from new-host.home (pool-72-74-19-153.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. []) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k186sm28318520ywf.14.2016. for <mif@ietf.org> (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Mar 2016 04:24:47 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Margaret Cullen <mrcullen42@gmail.com>
From: Margaret Cullen <margaretw42@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <39E5345B-04C4-4149-A1A6-F0F5F4988C16@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 07:24:45 -0500
To: "mif@ietf.org List" <mif@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mif/stIea8nq9432pI4hClUeh5KIBYE>
Subject: [mif] New Charter Items
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mif/>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 12:24:54 -0000

At the last IETF meeting, and later on the mailing list, we reached consensus that we would use a two-step approach for the configuration of explicit PVDs.  RAs would be used to provide the information to do a second-step look up, including the PVD name.  Then a second step would be used to look up further information about the PVD.

The only proposal we currently have on the table for a second-step look-up is a DNS look-up, and no one seems to proposing any other second step, so I believe there are three things that we need to define in order for this to work:

- An NTP server option for RAs, so that DNSSEC can be used for the lookup.
- A PVD Name option for RAs, so that we can tell hosts what PVD to look up.
- What PVD information can be stored in the DNS and how it will be retrieved.

Those things would need to be added to our charter, so that we can accept corresponding work items.

Does anyone have any objection to adding these three things to the MIF charter?  If not, the chairs and the AD will put together a propos