Re: [mile] AD review of Implementation draft

[Daisuke MIYAMOTO <[e-mail]>]

Dear Kathleen,

 Thank you very much for your support.
 I will amend our draft until the end of the month.

Kind regards,
Daisuke

On 2016/05/20 4:47, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Thank you for your work on the implementation report, it looks great!
> I have some comments, which are mostly nits that should be addressed
> before I initiate the IETF last call.  I also need to look into the
> links included as informative references as they may not be considered
> stable, so I'll get back to you on that as well.
> 
> Section 1:
> 
> We'll have trouble with http://siis.realmv6.org/implementations/ as a
> stable reference, but I'm not sure what to do about that and will get
> back to you.
> 
> Section 2.3
> nit:
> s/fro/for/
>    Research and Education Networking Information Sharing and Analysis
>    Center (REN-ISAC) is a private community of the research and higher
>    education members fro sharing
> 
> Consider changing from:
>    REN-ISAC also recommends to use of the IODEF attachment provided with
>    the notification email be processed rather than relying on parsing of
>    the email body text.  The interface provided by REN-ISAC are designed
>    for dealing with such email.
> To:
>    REN-ISAC also recommends to use an IODEF attachment provided with
>    a notification email for processing rather than relying on parsing of
>    the email body text.  The interface provided by REN-ISAC are designed
>    to handle such email.
> 
> Section 3.1
> 
> Probably not necessary to include "Internet Engineering Task Force",
> just IETF is enough as it's a well known acronym.
> 
> Section 6.2
> Is IDMEF expanded anywhere?  What is SNML?
> 
> Section 6.3
> s/IODEf/IODEF/
> and
> s/IODef/IODEF/
> 
> 
> Thank you!
>