Re: [mile] [IANA #911630] RE: Evaluation: <draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22.txt> to Proposed Standard

["Roman D. Danyliw" <[e-mail]>]

Good afternoon Amanda!

Thanks for the example.  Could you please make the column names:

** "Attribute Value"
** "Description"
** "Reference"

Back to my earlier example:

Sub-Registry name: Contact-role
Attribute Value = creator
Description = The entity that generate the document.
Reference = RFC-num-of-this-document

Roman

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amanda Baber via RT [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 2:57 PM
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: [IANA #911630] RE: Evaluation: <draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22.txt>
> to Proposed Standard
> 
> Hi Roman,
> 
> One more question: should the contents of Section 10.2's "IV (Value)"
> column appear anywhere in the registry? For example, should it be the label
> for that registry's value column? For example, in the CDNI Payload Types
> registry at http://www.iana.org/assignments/cdni-parameters, the label for
> the value column is "Payload Type."
> 
> thanks,
> Amanda
> 
> On Thu Jun 02 13:24:34 2016, [e-mail] wrote:
> > Hello Amanda!
> >
> > Sorry for the confusion.  Let me clarify below ...
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Amanda Baber via RT [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:22 AM
> > > Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > > Subject: [IANA #910912] Evaluation: <draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-
> > > 22.txt> to Proposed Standard
> > >
> > > IESG:
> > >
> > > IANA NOT OK.  Comments in tracker
> > > IANA Actions - NOT OK
> > >
> > > How to populate these 33 registries is unclear.
> > >
> > > For example, Section 3.9 says, “These values are maintained in the
> > > ‘Contact-
> > > role’ IANA registry per Section 10.2” and then presents a list of 19
> > > items. Is the “Contact-role” registry made up of the single entry in
> > > the IANA Considerations table, as the IANA Considerations section
> > > seems to indicate, or does it consist of the 19 items in Section
> > > 3.9? If the latter, where should the entries in 10.2 table's "IV
> > > (Value)" column be placed?
> >
> > Taking "Contact-role" as an example, the desired outcome is the
> > following:
> >
> > --[ snip ]--
> > Registry name: Contact-role
> >
> > Value, Description, Reference
> > "creator", "The entity that generate the document.", RFC-num-of-this-
> > document "reporter, "The entity that reported the information.",
> > RFC-num-of- this-document "admin", "An administrative contact or
> > business owner for an asset or organization.",
> > RFC-num-of-this-document ... [ entry #4 - 18] ...
> > "ext-value", "A value used to indicate that this attribute is extended
> > and the actual value is provided using the corresponding ext-*
> > attribute." , RFC-num-of-this-document --[ snip ]--
> >
> > Yes, each enumerate value will be a distinct entry in a given
> > registry.  Contact-role would have 19 entries.
> >
> > I realized that there is no text saying that a reference to this
> > document should be added to each registry entries in the Reference
> > column.
> >
> > Roman
> 
>