IETF Logo Mail Archive

[MLS] [interim_transcript_hash]

Pascal Junod <pascalj@snap.com> Thu, 10 October 2019 14:02 UTC

Return-Path: <pjunod@snapchat.com>
X-Original-To: mls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7898D1200A3 for <mls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=snap.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7S9G1MwaXUV4 for <mls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com (mail-io1-xd2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ED10120099 for <mls@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2a.google.com with SMTP id v2so13866948iob.10 for <mls@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=snap.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=FvQCJPezF2LCZXKFG0vlX8+Sha+NRmTpxgzYxgeWOlc=; b=IMjiX1rZJfot449IebMsZFe+B40RLSD5BFHZxSgQ8r3Mt56j7WnRTPxeYSVs12B1RP yvku9JvKAy+9u+U7tIgaW1xg8vwkhym7G6Gdu5snVhZYqCodYOOEcOfQvsEJTJMySkxX +gwwEAjwZoD8bljgWFCDyTtEIiXMa8OV/rdQA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=FvQCJPezF2LCZXKFG0vlX8+Sha+NRmTpxgzYxgeWOlc=; b=T88SkzaWisSu/G24kJo1O9z7hDLVTqFf6/tDr6Fbvddw2iT4Cy3ALV/34pvNTnZBm/ o+t1GPDeWbOCy+vMabMy/WYj74y3kcGsMB8hnu9sArkjQ1f20xfe6fC5QaA8dEvcfZwH vWpm7xBNAnkD9LHcZ7K3ho152nDgrxhS11/zRav1off6k4mOq6lZv2A3XbPev4pDnmf6 GzAq3y1dKgzSbz07ywkr/UWc8fHhYg9oqG0XeIlgumuvrjAiHgGLG2R4asc145va/XUz J1b1ZDPse8dR9eOOSoLABThF8l69FBtLT+9b1XSPuoeYQmguX3CmKVkCgq7KT2B2G6SE B7FA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWf6niylLu4VT7DvBBwQAYtrVFILkeN5AcCh4mJvPNfjozY5hcz uENLQasczS5YHpMtp/yklZax4gsVqzbqZLumOmcMDMJx2Ys=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyesx3k5nFrfOEeeu69HP2kJ9s7bZ4dOY71ypFJMOguWiUQCNC+wlZrRs9ul9Lt2mx89JDWdc2uftfYGTjJ0qM=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:ba8d:: with SMTP id g13mr10453578jao.93.1570716147171; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Pascal Junod <pascalj@snap.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 16:02:16 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPOUjt7K4_sCfnA5zjOBTSDaHZVrvG5mqLB-jZ14yMQMZe7Avw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Messaging Layer Security WG <mls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fee6aa05948ed99d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mls/PYT_Cg6Ie5I-bO50l2wQvVWHXj8>
Subject: [MLS] [interim_transcript_hash]
X-BeenThere: mls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Layer Security <mls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mls>, <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mls>, <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 14:02:30 -0000

Hi !

Just wondering whether there is a reason why the interim_transcript_hash
value (necessary to build Welcome messages) value is not contained into the
GroupContext structure.

Best,

Pascal

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email