Re: [Mobopts] [IRSG] Poll to publish draft-irtf-mobopts-mpa-framework-07

Rajeev,
        We will address the additional comments that were received on 
the IRSG and MOBOPTS RG during the polling process and will submit the 
revised version soon.

Regards
Ashutosh Dutta
Draft Editor

On 7/1/2010 11:08 AM, Rajeev Koodli wrote:
>
> This concludes the Poll. We have a required Ready to Publish and a No
> Objection vote.
>
> Authors: please address the comments received on the IRSG and MobOpts RG
> lists. And, submit a revised version.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Rajeev
>
>
>
> On 6/27/10 6:05 PM, "Rajeev Koodli"<rkoodli@cisco.com>  wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Aaron,
>>
>> we have a Ready to Publish (from Juergen) and a No Objection (from John L).
>> So, I think we can move forward. However, I will wait until the June 30th, as
>> mentioned in the Poll message below.
>> I will request authors to make any editorial revisions based on the input
>> received until then (e.g., the feedback from John L to mention the
>> experimental work in the Introduction).
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Rajeev
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Aaron Falk [mailto:falk@bbn.com]
>> Sent: Sun 6/20/2010 1:48 PM
>> To: irsg@ISI.EDU
>> Cc: Koodli, Rajeev; mobopts@irtf.org
>> Subject: Re: [IRSG] Poll to publish draft-irtf-mobopts-mpa-framework-07
>>
>> IRSG-
>>
>> As a reminder, documents require at least one 'Ready to Publish' response to
>> progress.
>>
>> --aaron
>>
>> On 6/18/10 5:54 PM, Rajeev Koodli wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dear IRSG,
>>
>> I have not heard any responses on this Poll yet. Could you please respond by
>> June 30?
>>
>> Please use one of the poll responses defined below.
>>
>> The possible poll responses are:
>>
>>     o  'Ready to publish' -- requires a thorough read and reasonably
>>         detailed review
>>
>>     o  'Not ready to publish' -- requires a thorough read, reasonably
>>        detailed review, and actionable comments.
>>
>>     o  'No objection' -- I don't object if this document goes forward;
>>        I've read the document (perhaps quickly); I have some small
>>        comments which are not show stoppers; I don't have great
>>        expertise in the area.
>>
>>     o  'Request more time to review' -- a commitment to provide a
>>        thorough review in a specified period of time.
>>
>> Document URL:  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-mobopts-mpa-framework-07
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Rajeev
>> (Document Shepherd)
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/28/10 4:04 PM, "Rajeev Koodli"<rkoodli@cisco.com>  wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear IRSG,
>>
>> This is a poll requesting your vote on the ID.
>> The IRSG review by Juergen Schoenwaelder resulted in a major revision,
>> followed by another editorial revision.
>>
>> The tracker URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/ticket/27
>>
>> Please note that the ticket says "reopened doc review". This was due to my
>> error in submitting the changes incorrectly on the wiki. The document was not
>> closed earlier on.
>>
>> Appreciate your prompt consideration of the vote (after the holiday weekend in
>> the US).
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -Rajeev
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRSG mailing list
>> IRSG@mailman.isi.edu
>> http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/irsg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRSG mailing list
>> IRSG@mailman.isi.edu
>> http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/irsg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRSG mailing list
>> IRSG@mailman.isi.edu
>> http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/irsg
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mobopts mailing list
> Mobopts@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts