IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Model-t] Web Tracking

Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com> Mon, 17 February 2020 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ximaera@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: model-t@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: model-t@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A37120882 for <model-t@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:48:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5h_kDHpT_JTx for <model-t@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:48:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb32.google.com (mail-yb1-xb32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 811C5120807 for <model-t@iab.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:48:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb32.google.com with SMTP id w17so9466541ybm.1 for <model-t@iab.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:48:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9yBhjNQ6jcVj20AsM+249/EImEcdEBrcF1hmHDRvMXw=; b=UdbHxKW55RHbxGVu9AJAs7JiLeAVSk/nJb3XXoNEOTWYlb/amUX9iLAy0Y3Z2eeiSD Ad5YxpAJPBi8vzzFdCGNY9qmDZtQHOypGSHfHwKJ3sLwotwnMjk/XSMe0eGziyDm9HwQ dSmy51WIk+O/b2ooDvJ8UOPNLQD8foaoIdGqNSCmWqW2q4Izc5t3skRZCBetG96i0R1S VPnUm/W0rEaG18m+C8OloCTELY8OpjTvLRvVm3zC110fZmVseEdg8GhJAqu6aonLwVl5 op6t7MfBQqjyPGYjpjQLxfkcCkujcNo527k8YJbKRwaH85lo62F6P6RW2xA5pkhTYLpi 2Y0w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9yBhjNQ6jcVj20AsM+249/EImEcdEBrcF1hmHDRvMXw=; b=QDQ9Yn9OFXzJK7OZIPInQqePJBuXRMH7L8Bvg4L4grbRToyGIeQvBwRHOi0KjdPqvE QjR8VIjcMYPeuVAxQLnJcbuAnAIWAKs8h1M017UR9hvY3AHJVGFpfsKqnOwVrMuUDVPg 65fldPhcRSiawyhTB4/VvZlML/qWiHLfmDWuoB6y0YWYVISzFtQzfZFUdLosMbOmmVH3 SeZBydk6ge/YVlaQ8fk9/L82DYfqu8yQNq/Y+Y7oC8iDAeR4ug4evTemYWBXHMp2r7LD PcFB2vesPNuUkvu8jk0Eg5yjIbSpBoSYP0ABn4JzYYxqXCy+rthY5DKySgYSnr8zdNtF hgOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUdgPK3HEKO6IkbylJPI6KXjSywbDW9LRq0RD6B7mKpANeVFgM3 CRDoTZwuRSq5pyIkyd810SMRWPp3pnW1S1Oi+n6eZg6x
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz6Ecr0sfGWIyooFjNwgZzUiCYaVlWS7zAyZmoBHLTHN4JHur0qSWmp8xH1YzomOjz8h9A5PWBap9EuptZygmc=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:889:: with SMTP id 131mr16995032ybi.497.1581976114474; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:48:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABcZeBN-HNe-j2japnCT5HR49__mxR7jiFAJ4NO27CdpuvirXw@mail.gmail.com> <CALZ3u+b5LWSP4eu3DMWZ9om5rE2owehBHBTk1id=MJ9pvc-73Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBO6v9a6hXqbj_RxLxamZvvjU13BRJLnWb-V8g6wBpVZ3g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBO6v9a6hXqbj_RxLxamZvvjU13BRJLnWb-V8g6wBpVZ3g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:48:23 +0300
Message-ID: <CALZ3u+b070vGKwi+QeCoE-hvbgXEYnzRCwyKLZ5cqetXgCHJjw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: model-t@iab.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000058b364059ecc849e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/model-t/SAMxHnTem7MNfFe7LkA1W69De6w>
Subject: Re: [Model-t] Web Tracking
X-BeenThere: model-t@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of changes in Internet deployment patterns and their impact on the Internet threat model <model-t.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/model-t>, <mailto:model-t-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/model-t/>
List-Post: <mailto:model-t@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:model-t-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/model-t>, <mailto:model-t-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 21:48:37 -0000

Peace,

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020, 12:34 AM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> Thanks for your note. I feel like both of these attacks fall into the
> category of "local compromise" and thus are in a distinct bucket from Web
> tracking.
>

There are different shades of "local" on the user's machine.  E.g. I think
one of the purposes of QLOG was to provide transparency about what
applications are doing by resurrecting the side reporting channel (which
existed ad-hoc before the applications began to carry their own encryption
stacks) to the system.

I personally feel there are different *scopes* of tracking rather than
different types.  The difference is basically that we won't be able to find
a MECE segmentation which won't be biased.

--
Töma

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email