IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Model-t] Next steps from Tuesday's breakfast meeting

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Sat, 23 November 2019 09:56 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: model-t@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: model-t@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECC3120086 for <model-t@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 01:56:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2OagkcRy4jIF for <model-t@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 01:56:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64EC912004A for <model-t@iab.org>; Sat, 23 Nov 2019 01:56:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id xAN9uZti004282 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 23 Nov 2019 04:56:38 -0500
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2019 01:56:35 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>, model-t@iab.org
Message-ID: <20191123095635.GJ32847@mit.edu>
References: <A35A9A80-80A4-41A4-8C9B-4A964D565854@isoc.org> <b46fcb4d-45a6-3efd-a93e-357571bde679@nomountain.net> <2B51AC31-F1E5-4A26-BA9E-F2C5A467059F@piuha.net> <f4476245-f68f-17b1-0983-e3c54de16645@cs.tcd.ie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f4476245-f68f-17b1-0983-e3c54de16645@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/model-t/p2IpOUeRF0oRjCMY1_I5ZO31mjU>
Subject: Re: [Model-t] Next steps from Tuesday's breakfast meeting
X-BeenThere: model-t@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of changes in Internet deployment patterns and their impact on the Internet threat model <model-t.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/model-t>, <mailto:model-t-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/model-t/>
List-Post: <mailto:model-t@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:model-t-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/model-t>, <mailto:model-t-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2019 09:56:44 -0000

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 04:30:55AM +0000, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> Hiya,
> 
> I agree with all below except I'd not say "competing." The
> way I think about it is people are working independently on
> more or less the same thing but from different perspectives
> and bringing different backgrounds. And that's a good
> thing.
> 
> So I hope we don't think about this in terms of competition
> but rather as a set of people taking different paths to
> what we hope might be the same destination.

To pull in a word from Dominque's earlier message: "efficiency" may come at
the cost of missing some creative thoughts that would have been expressed
in a more independent development.  Or, at least that's my interpretation
of what is being said.

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email