[Modern] Comments on draft-peterson-modern-teri-valid-00
"McGarry, Tom" <Tom.McGarry@team.neustar> Mon, 17 July 2017 08:11 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=2371579e54=tom.mcgarry@team.neustar>
X-Original-To: modern@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: modern@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8675713179D for <modern@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=team.neustar
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MmUxc6kJOODd for <modern@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com (mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75903131798 for <modern@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0078664.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v6H82lmh011839 for <modern@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 04:11:31 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=team.neustar; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : mime-version; s=selector1; bh=4ItUoc1+5pPtRvyHbPfvavjvh6mNA4VbihloyV9YY5s=; b=Nn2HWmAdsEU56sl/OTY1nj/UYxTAvBwkgTswGmU5hoBYiBNwen+fZ64pmUtjviP704yg Adyt6ycXN0WgDeYCAYzypHyBBSlm6GnRVh+nnVAV4EF7Cj8FtA30asZuOcmmZlUv2Kc4 ZhNvzb8q9HYqXVucVvBvTGSIJwyuVAXF97Tx1nXqh1Qlwu4SsGJ9AJA23wRH0KqR7KQJ KPMKagHYDdLiWU7OWdTEpdDolH0O2exKd1B2cPIQesRegKtOFfhZwYWy/H4pFnt+6UMu GbDadWPCa4/9hLPBBWUlX9u5/cDSUE6cuzhQFVmz15GWAAzqIoKWquXiJHqh1SRWFn02 vA==
Received: from stntexhc12.cis.neustar.com ([156.154.17.216]) by mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2bqdpvkqjn-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <modern@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 04:11:30 -0400
Received: from STNTEXMB11.cis.neustar.com ([169.254.1.47]) by stntexhc12.cis.neustar.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 04:11:29 -0400
From: "McGarry, Tom" <Tom.McGarry@team.neustar>
To: Modern List <modern@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Comments on draft-peterson-modern-teri-valid-00
Thread-Index: AQHS/tRLuR6OHWgxdk62k9nDPx51Qg==
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:11:29 +0000
Message-ID: <D591E85F.42BC4%tom.mcgarry@neustar.biz>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.4.160422
x-originating-ip: [10.96.9.117]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D591E85F42BC4tommcgarryneustarbiz_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-07-17_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1706020000 definitions=main-1707170124
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/modern/rFlG_1GNtikYDRp29SnDg6KmxSo>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 02:58:38 -0700
Subject: [Modern] Comments on draft-peterson-modern-teri-valid-00
X-BeenThere: modern@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managing, Ordering, Distributing, Exposing, & Registering telephone Numbers non-WG discussion list" <modern.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/modern>, <mailto:modern-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/modern/>
List-Post: <mailto:modern@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:modern-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/modern>, <mailto:modern-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:56:32 -0000
ALLOCATED VS ASSIGNED There are generally 3 states for the number: * "Available" to be allocated to a service provider (I suppose “Unavailable" is also a state) * “Allocated" to a service provider * “Assigned" to a user This draft addresses the last two, but only uses the term “allocated”. It would be good to have both and make the distinction. QUERY VS LIST This seems to be a query and response process, e.g., tell me about this number or block of numbers. We should include the ability to pull down a list, e.g., provide me all allocated numbers, provide me all allocated numbers in this prefix. NIT 4.1, 1st para., last word is misspelled Tom McGarry
- [Modern] Comments on draft-peterson-modern-teri-v… McGarry, Tom