Re: [mpls] IPR poll for draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-encapsulation

["Andrew G. Malis" <[e-mail]>]

As a co-author I am not aware of IPR related to this draft.

Cheers,
Andy
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:45 AM Joel Halpern <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> That is no IPR. I have no opinion on our. I have strong opinions on phone
> autocorrect.
> Yours,
> Joel
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: IPR poll for draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-encapsulation
> From: Joel Halpern <[e-mail]>
> Date: Dec 14, 2018, 11:42
> To: Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>,[e-mail]
> I am not aware of any relevant PIE.
> Yours,
> Joel
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: IPR poll for draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-encapsulation
> From: Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>
> Date: Dec 14, 2018, 11:31
> To: [e-mail]
> Working Group,
>
> We are currently preparing draft draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-encapsulation
> for working group last call.
>
> Part of this preparation is to do an IPR poll.
>
> This mail is to start the IPR poll.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-
> encapsulation?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> There are no IPR disclosures directly against
> draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-encapsulation.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
> /Loa
>   mpls wg co-chair
> --
>
>
> Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
> Senior MPLS Expert
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: [phone]
>