Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping

Hannes Gredler <hannes@gredler.at> Tue, 06 June 2017 09:46 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes@gredler.at>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2441129BA2; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 02:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0_vdz4k3db-p; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 02:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gilfert.gredler.at (gilfert.gredler.at [87.106.222.165]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFBB4129B9E; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 02:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hannes-mba.local (188-23-180-232.adsl.highway.telekom.at [::ffff:188.23.180.232]) (AUTH: PLAIN hannes, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by gilfert.gredler.at with ESMTPSA; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 11:46:21 +0200 id 00000000032DC2EB.00000000593679EF.000042AE
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
References: <14c7b495-b3ce-8f81-d7ef-7abc33424acb@pi.nu>
From: Hannes Gredler <hannes@gredler.at>
Message-ID: <05a33fce-37e6-2fb2-a290-225c7b61d981@gredler.at>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 11:46:21 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <14c7b495-b3ce-8f81-d7ef-7abc33424acb@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/9Utl7l-SgILSD2z6R5qm5O5O6As>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 09:46:33 -0000

hi loa,

i am not aware of any IPR around draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping.

/hannes

On 6/5/17 09:39, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group, authors,
> 
> We have started to prepare the the draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping for
> wglc, prior to the wglc we need to do an IPR poll.
> 
> This mail starts this IPR poll.
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
> draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping?
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> 
> No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on draft-ietf-mpls-
> spring-lsp-ping or the individual document it replaced.
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and contributor.
> 
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> Since this document might be of interest for the SPRING wg, it has been
> copied to the SPRING wg mailing list.
> 
> /Loa
> mpls wg co-chair