Re: [mpls] Correction: IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework

Dan Frost <danfrost@cisco.com> Mon, 14 October 2013 12:03 UTC

Return-Path: <danfrost@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1989311E8132 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 05:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TWColw0XUHEY for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 05:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD20721E815F for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 05:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1510; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1381752180; x=1382961780; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=+PTS4UieGQcH7q1vGYg5ID/pgGzXgyHHpphrWAaVCws=; b=j1kPBryijV0FuctWqyIXmhtnHnOb0r/jl0VFiiyTPtsk0bFmaoe1mwaW Bdhm0g+ZoMJlMm0WYMpghV6INP/0u9N1qk6GyIj17yaXrJB/1PtaS1yzM tj00YZ+zHoRuMzBNC9WQGYY7kvga1zpnRkyfOLCZ/8UBomEdCztQq+4SM I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMFAFncW1KtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABZgwfCeIEfFnSCJQEBAQQsQgYFEAsYCSUPAQRJE4gGvUqOCRCBOQeEIwOYBZICgyU7gTQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,492,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="271757436"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2013 12:02:59 +0000
Received: from isolaria.cisco.com (isolaria.cisco.com [10.83.106.70]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9EC2wGN001492 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:02:59 GMT
Received: from isolaria.cisco.com (isolaria [127.0.0.1]) by isolaria.cisco.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r9EC2wgm006659; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 08:02:58 -0400
Received: (from danfrost@localhost) by isolaria.cisco.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id r9EC2vU9006658; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:02:57 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: isolaria.cisco.com: danfrost set sender to danfrost@cisco.com using -f
From: Dan Frost <danfrost@cisco.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <5258CFEE.5040102@pi.nu> (Loa Andersson's message of "Sat, 12 Oct 2013 12:28:30 +0800")
References: <5258CD91.7000508@pi.nu> <5258CFEE.5040102@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:02:57 +0100
Message-ID: <y1gmbo2soya6.fsf@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Correction: IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:03:09 -0000

I am not aware of any applicable IPR.

-d

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>; writes:
> OK - the dyslexia struck again!
>
> /Loa
>
> On 2013-10-12 12:18, Loa Andersson wrote:
>> Working Group,
>>
>> The authors and chairs are working to prepare
>> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework for working group last call.
>> I have given the authors a set of comments that are mostly editorial,
>> this is in no way impacting the IPR situation. The authors are
>> working to update the document and the wglc will be issued on the
>> new version
>>
>> Before we start the working group last call we will do an IPR poll.
>>
>> This mail starts that IPR poll.
>>
>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to ddraft-ietf-mpls-tp-p2mp-
>> framework?
>>
>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>>
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
>> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
>> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
>> documents will not advance to the next stage until a response
>> has been received from each author and contributor.
>>
>> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
>> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
>> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>>
>> Thanks, Loa
>> (as MPLS WG co-chair)