Re: RFC1006 extension ISO Transport Class 2 Non-use of Explicit Flow Control over TCP
Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no Wed, 10 May 1995 09:06 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00841; 10 May 95 5:06 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00837; 10 May 95 5:06 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01949; 10 May 95 5:06 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00830; 10 May 95 5:06 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00826; 10 May 95 5:06 EDT
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01944; 10 May 95 5:06 EDT
Received: from domen.uninett.no by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-22) id <AA05054>; Wed, 10 May 1995 02:07:02 -0700
Received: from dale.uninett.no by domen.uninett.no with SMTP (PP) id <17495-0@domen.uninett.no>; Wed, 10 May 1995 11:03:07 +0200
Received: from dale.uninett.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dale.uninett.no (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA09390; Wed, 10 May 1995 11:03:03 +0200
Message-Id: <199505100903.LAA09390@dale.uninett.no>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.5.3 12/28/94
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
To: Yanick <pouffary@taec.enet.dec.com>
Cc: mankin@isi.edu, postel@isi.edu, iesg@isi.edu, dan@netrix.enet.dec.com, bound@xirtlu.enet.dec.com
Subject: Re: RFC1006 extension ISO Transport Class 2 Non-use of Explicit Flow Control over TCP
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 09 May 1995 14:25:09 +0700." <9505091156.AA22585@vbormc.vbo.dec.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 10 May 1995 11:03:02 +0200
X-Orig-Sender: hta@dale.uninett.no
I'll try to get the person who told me about the other comments
to pass on the request for the comments to the person who made it.
For the moment, count me as liking the idea of having a session on
this topic (RFC 1006 and related protocols) at the upcoming IETF.
Harald A
- RE: RFC1006 extension ISO Transport Class 2 Non-u… Yanick
- Re: RFC1006 extension ISO Transport Class 2 Non-u… Harald.T.Alvestrand