IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Comments on -04

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 31 January 2017 01:36 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC1C12983F for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 17:36:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OKyCl2dEnNo1 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 17:36:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E9441297F7 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 17:36:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16B9BE39; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 01:36:41 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F1tuUdGvR4gq; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 01:36:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.75] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA43DBE38; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 01:36:39 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1485826600; bh=4eEZEXC8845YVcik/8UGOksb6t2A0WVBH6vetRKi0pg=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=F29qegYjD6cZEDkTOT6LVCBMfIV4leg6N5VgXCAXI8oHocxDqYz6qNDPhhaWGbnAd mwQECObSPyuXk0Q3wz8GqNHCjiOi/urWfY1Y9CjGW3v4t+fZxDTELkZqD8G/RdItH0 bv+16HGT+oM1rZ6DzJdoPfBHFvFMmSYeZ40Wgamo=
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
References: <20170131010548.GL47762@mx2.yitter.info> <de401360-8827-c427-19fe-ace8d2987f40@gmail.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <c95f9b4f-f4e3-032a-6740-b52765690df6@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 01:36:39 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <de401360-8827-c427-19fe-ace8d2987f40@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms080405020604000906000802"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/IMGpxRF6RNYmem0nJIH2halLZSw>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Comments on -04
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 01:36:46 -0000


On 31/01/17 01:31, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Personally, I'd be fine if the criteria were not qualified
> as mandatory/important/desired at all. It would save argument
> and change very little or nothing.

FWIW, I'd be ok with that approach - it may be better
to have all the criteria at the level of "MUST be
considered" and leave it at that. That said, I'm not
sure if this list already debated that.r

S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email