Re: [Mud] mudmaker ICMP support?
Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Thu, 11 July 2019 19:43 UTC
Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56111120155 for <mud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 12:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nuijzXMYKK6Y for <mud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 12:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E89A912013B for <mud@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 12:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1145; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1562874219; x=1564083819; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=1PGW1l9MMZlPeI+3MBc+qVqH4oPC3MRkEM+hl/odMZI=; b=h5zP5VTEvE7HBZ7QvsvqWzcJleaX2wUazicjpfNTsHPTsWssONsDtcKp 5OVItqZMNtFJ0N6tpuo3+jJgkYmbzgF7uMWcH+XxUKJAxswR8c4Ac7S6n E5+Tj6ms0WEVRuob0oZYfV8KsAD7s1V5Vm3mSjb/r14vnfXLPuCGgLm4j s=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AFAADfkCdd/xbLJq1lGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBVAMBAQEBAQsBgwBRASASKIQciHuLTiWJUI8ogXsCBwEBAQkDAQEYCwwBAYRAAoJ2NQgOAQMBAQQBAQIBBW2FPAyFSgEBAQECAQEBIUsLBQsLGCoCAiEGMAYTgyIBgWoDDg8PrCyBMoVHgkANghYKBoE0AYFQiiWBf4E4DBOCTD6CGkcBAYRrMoImBJRslS9ACYIbgh+BDIxpg3QbghwBixiKTpZsiwaDCwIEBgUCFYFSATWBWDMaCBsVOyoBgkE+iwiFQT0DMJAGAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,479,1557187200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="14201651"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 11 Jul 2019 19:43:36 +0000
Received: from [10.61.233.35] ([10.61.233.35]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x6BJhZfn030914 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Jul 2019 19:43:36 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <87E54DD5-1184-4529-866E-2B0CDF5B33CD@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F20FBD18-1D46-419D-8E18-4C1A01E218C6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 21:43:35 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAHiu4JOemKY=UAAxkLRcjaCOsvva+ppxV=mvc-MRMzSrQWJ=ww@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: mud@ietf.org
To: "M. Ranganathan" <mranga@gmail.com>
References: <CAHiu4JOemKY=UAAxkLRcjaCOsvva+ppxV=mvc-MRMzSrQWJ=ww@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.233.35, [10.61.233.35]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mud/HQmj2ULVJDu-5lpW7Y5kATqOHcc>
Subject: Re: [Mud] mudmaker ICMP support?
X-BeenThere: mud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Manufacturer Ussage Descriptions <mud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mud>, <mailto:mud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mud/>
List-Post: <mailto:mud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mud>, <mailto:mud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 19:43:43 -0000
> On 11 Jul 2019, at 19:14, M. Ranganathan <mranga@gmail.com> wrote: > > Mudmaker leaves out ICMP as a protocol choice. Was this intentional or simply a matter of not having enough time to add it? It’s allowed. See Page 13, middle of the page, what ACL model features are recommended. Eliot > > Thanks, > > Ranga > > -- > M. Ranganathan > > -- > Mud mailing list > Mud@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mud
- [Mud] mudmaker ICMP support? M. Ranganathan
- Re: [Mud] mudmaker ICMP support? M. Ranganathan
- Re: [Mud] mudmaker ICMP support? Eliot Lear