Re: [multimob] Proposals and charter discussion

["Seil Jeon" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Stig & multimob friends,

For the technical evaluation, I would introduce the effect of tunnel
convergence problem.

We compare and analyze four cases : bi-directioal, MoM, MMG and our PMIPv6
solution.

You can search the document at IEEE Xplore as a following name.

"Mobility Management based on Proxy Mobile IPv6 for Multicasting Services
in Home Networks"



-----Original Message-----
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
Behalf Of Stig Venaas
Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 6:31 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: [multimob] Proposals and charter discussion

The main goal of our meeting in Hiroshima is to see if we can adopt
documents for our charter work items. In addition to the technical
evaluation, we also need to consider whether documents are within our
charter. Either whether the document is currently within the charter, or if
it can easily be updated to be within the charter.

For PMIP, we have the following milestone:

Nov 2009 Initial version of a document explaining the use of multicast in
PMIPv6

It might be good to get some discussion on the list prior to the meeting to
see which proposals may be within the charter and a candidate for this. We
will certainly be discussing this in the meeting, but by having some
discussion and analysis on the mailing list before the meeting, we may be
able to have a better discussion at the meeting itself.

You should all read the charter at
http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/multimob-charter.html

Some of the important points related to PMIP (this may not be a full list,
so read the charter itself) are:

1. Work requiring modifications to mobility protocols and IGMPv3/MLDv2
    is out of scope in this first stage of this working group.
    Modifications to multicast routing protocols are out of scope.

2. This work will not require any additions or changes to message types
    and parameters specified in RFC 5213,

3. and must assume an unmodified mobile host.

4. The work will employ the remote subscription model. This is a
    mechanism by which a mobile node joins a multicast group and
    receives multicast data forwarded via the local mobility anchor.

I hope I've given managed to point out the main points in the charter in a
fair way. It's the charter text itself that is important, not what I write
here though.

I now hope we can get some discussion on whether the different proposals
match the points above, or if you like, the charter text.

Stig, co-chair hat on
_______________________________________________
multimob mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob