Re: [multipathtcp] Multipath TCP : a ten years retrospective

vineet deshpande <vineetdeshpande@yahoo.com> Fri, 31 May 2019 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <vineetdeshpande@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5517D120193 for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2019 11:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MJtzPT3lliQS for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2019 11:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonic301-3.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com (sonic301-3.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com [74.6.129.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3551120146 for <multipathtcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 May 2019 11:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1559328386; bh=jpf5EgxgV2lGxEf9cnkgfV2iDkrsMs0YeM4aE4vI3EQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=LkG9slso7aVnr6kd5n57uUr4Va867GakWT1dkVqlNECyb0FaxV37zCQj0yVHtFCBgEpMGWuh0/Yx8QArzfNbybje98yQqavpP5Whbn/ZJvYT0IHHEOmmAVQw3qwNMhY4LsSQfsf/Svzb8gdDsh2zfgzp2vHTtYLkzWwJR8Ipqr5w3+tTMcNI88ur/zptQ9Mjy7wLax8unpy4RON9bhpU1sUia8R95Xs8U9LVAqtMCp9IQqQbAbnKZjtA12ZhbYyYu1XZ5vd43k6TwKoiDDB/ZUGDdrKnEKWzbgNp8Exq+DPLzmfpZK81O6ucfQu0hCCojMrJ2MyJYm/A65Q7Twn78A==
X-YMail-OSG: rJROTeoVM1lErvbTsZjmrwRByzWGQ_ocTSenr03ttQNh6VotKtDd0GZKsXl4qCf _zFq6EUU5OIxJM1D5Kc6wKvkDZUmqcoyDosxy.plmVL14ykJWx6P7jX8bypUVzLnjlZxw_muclzE TUplqnaKNcqq1TeQwfmN_wwXRYCKwpMc1SrdVI9WY8l7nB.ouQWPMUcrLpNZj0rG2_iCVLwE95Xy i5HI6V.AZ80UF7kkJxT3B6hNiY3h3N3av0v3GNM2KK7TEE9M2lI4i0n_IJMLmRCdQxVW8VIUzuZE xDt1iPL9EaRZ8h_6Y6W2DM7eQ4DSVgx2TUKYYFfQGNic9O3FgJDaVna7ENoCFArFVSIpCXeCsfo7 feRqJJ5A4d7ydbldk3vx.pXWveOScjanCYzjSiNnardNFgEfqw0IomTAkICq54LZiIfdMFX51gGz Ysq83rLap2QzCEAdC5A4OmmuQzpjmiIodofTaGlX50b7w4w5jgwLqH5ztKgEPMCCEQi8dJEBJcT7 1NdMeGF7cMT4gydQ7alSOSCgrQ_thDCFUvXllSR2E4Q_K0jzbUJDcyttlT9x.izlYNTPvc8dUmc5 kyTOkWyAPFkZmlqpX7M.5j8kM.l1SNSYB3d6vncEHx7mMIuzVAAzWsqD9ExA1YdPbdFNvUefYBVZ Ma52pSoRhEMhkYdnfq5rUQnm4EnbpTSsAWTJavYO2UFVpc0cJheuXaA3nznR2u4JlHIGGDEdUgPI gIp1J19Pg2s.8s6q.eXO8Dm26DUwwwJuuEOjhZE00Fgmju.E1tvUNdBbOWxPFf2oFB18JQonan.a WAUu.myHlvldzdx4WfVrgdDWDV_lwDhlp79r3wFX7kg0uUS9JZ8vf_IexR7wh8Zg211UdEuWZVSs K8UMH7VD6arWswrbOEq2LvrySNT5OTXENGwXQeq3WmtQlWInayG2MlhkX.vCQOSRUNHkwd06vhyq eUf9aADweXofC9mU4QoVp1cvLzgrIm.B05qjGe9GDUfy2ACSmJw7MSgwka_byZI8roMwIdNrl7_Z xHCSbWtpYPYVpXY1CdUwMOLzsZDVNiufFKyHJal0TKdxppYVJRztkImGUinDFbHp2W6TgVfs0vuR dQ9n8ss4Q5cs7.YkF1Vt7.MtrPUrbLE7xsZUYOs8v6kzc6iKBVWr_dLebOlqbIOk23SDFNAYEX.z stdNSSc2rEA4-
Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic301.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 31 May 2019 18:46:26 +0000
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 18:46:23 +0000 (UTC)
From: vineet deshpande <vineetdeshpande@yahoo.com>
To: Olivier Bonaventure <olivier.bonaventure@uclouvain.be>, Alan Ford <alan.ford@gmail.com>
Cc: multipathtcp <multipathtcp@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1744896267.7312634.1559328383652@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <D9A4F47E-59A6-43AF-8EA0-A38891095782@gmail.com>
References: <4af7cf08-289f-63d6-6076-b652bfd2c593@uclouvain.be> <D9A4F47E-59A6-43AF-8EA0-A38891095782@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_7312633_1975374016.1559328383650"
X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.13634 YMailNorrin Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/70.0.3538.67 Safari/537.36
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multipathtcp/6dqy9yfkPbxZ25ptS84kp7SQgFE>
Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] Multipath TCP : a ten years retrospective
X-BeenThere: multipathtcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-path extensions for TCP <multipathtcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/multipathtcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 18:46:30 -0000

 
Hi All,
Pardon my naive question. However I just need some clarification on a thought I had. Maybe someone can help me understand further. Hope this is the right place to pose this question and hope this email is not being intrusive.
I am aware that an interface can be made passive for a particular routing protocol like EIGRP, OSPF, etc. But can a routing protocol be passive on an interface for an instance of the routing protocol ? Say there are two instances of BGP (or OSPF, EIGRP) running on a single interface configured with multiple IPv6 addresses. Then theoretically it should be possible to run multiple routing protocol in parallel on the single interface. This would simplify the multi-topology design and also facilitate routing information exchange between the two instances of the same routing protocol. Seems like a must for Multipath routing.
Regards,Vineet
    On Friday, 28 December 2018, 10:40:36 pm GMT+5:30, Alan Ford <alan.ford@gmail.com>; wrote:  
 
 Hi Olivier,

I’d just like to say thank you for this series of blog posts - I found it very interesting to read back on a lot of the MPTCP history and design decisions. I hope other people found it interesting too!

Best wishes to the MPTCP WG for the new year!

Cheers,
Alan

> On 1 Dec 2018, at 07:09, Olivier Bonaventure <Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be>; wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> 
> This mailing list has been rather quiet recently, which is an indication 
> of the maturity of Multipath TCP. During the remaining days until 
> Christmas, I plan to write a series of blog posts that summarise the 
> main lessons learned while designing, implementing and deploying 
> Multipath TCP during the last decade. If there are papers, anecdotes or 
> unknown deployments that you think I should mention or if you'd like to 
> write an invited blog post in this advent calendar, please contact me 
> directly.
> 
> The first blog post is available on
> 
> http://blog.multipath-tcp.org/blog/html/2018/12/01/multipath_tcp_a_retrospective.html
> 
> The other blog posts will not be announced on this mailing list, they 
> will simply appear on the blog.
> 
> 
> Olivier Bonaventure
> _______________________________________________
> multipathtcp mailing list
> multipathtcp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp

_______________________________________________
multipathtcp mailing list
multipathtcp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp