Re: [multipathtcp] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mptcp-experience-06: (with COMMENT)

[Mirja Kühlewind <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

actually the answer might be 'no'. But I guess the reason why they don't talk 
about it, is because we don't have any reports here.

Mirja


On 14.09.2016 12:47, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-mptcp-experience-06: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mptcp-experience/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> I was a bit sad that there was no reporting of
> experiences with the security aspects of MPTCP.  Have
> we really learned nothing worth saying about that?
> Have we really seen no attacks on, or tailored to,
> MPTCP? It seems odd that the answer to both questions
> is "no."
>
>