Re: [Netconf] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-netconf-zerotouch-25: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]>]

Hi Ian,

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018, at 3:52 PM, [e-mail] wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
> 
> Thanks for the review. Please see my response for you comment on the
> Common Field Encoding below.> 
> Thanks,
> Ian
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 8.3.  Common Field Encoding
>>> 
>>>  Both of the DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 options defined in this section
>>>  encode>>>  a list of bootstrap server URIs.  The "URI" structure is an option>>>  that can contain multiple URIs (see [RFC7227], Section 5.7).
>>> 
>>>    bootstrap-server-list:
>>> 
>>> This is confusing, because I believe the following is a single entry>>> in the list, not the whole list syntax:
>>> 
>>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-...-+-+-+-+-+-+-+>>>    |       uri-length              |          URI                  |>>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-...-+-+-+-+-+-+-+>>> 
>>>    o uri-length: 2 octets long, specifies the length of the URI
>>>    data.>>> 
>>>    o URI: URI of zerotouch bootstrap server, using the HTTPS URI
>>>      scheme defined in Section 2.7.2 of RFC7230.  URI MUST be in
>>>      form "https://<ip-address-or-hostname>[:<port>]".
>>> 
>>> So if I am correct above, please clarify this by changing
>>> "bootstrap-server-list:" to "bootstrap-server-list is a list of 1
>>> or more>>> items, each with the following syntax:" (Or something like this.)
>>> 
>>> Also, "URI" deserve to be a Normative Reference, as it defines the
>>> generic syntax you are referring to.
>> 
> 
> [if  Propose removing the ‘bootstrap-server-list:’ line and extending> the intro paragraph to read:
> 
>  "Both of the DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 options defined in this section encode>  a list of bootstrap server URIs.  The "URI" structure is an option
>  that can contain multiple URIs (see [RFC7227], Section 5.7). Each URI>  entry in the bootstrap-server-list is structured as follows:”
> 
> Also, I’ve added RFC7230 to the normative references.]
> 
Yes, this looks good to me.

Thank you,
Alexey