Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040 (5633)

Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com> Thu, 17 October 2019 13:08 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190211101359.A9449B82486@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190211101359.A9449B82486@rfc-editor.org>
From: Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 14:07:58 +0100
Message-ID: <CABwpohtH4hYPQuW+sgE8CC7caNW4CMP5JG+uNb=Am-g5n2t4TA@mail.gmail.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, netconf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b71f1805951ae81f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/CB8aarmkXitBppGbRtF0rq8Q8Gg>
Subject: Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040 (5633)
Precedence: list

Hi there,

This applies to an example, and while factually correct, it does not seem
to be a technical errata as such, it is an editorial one

A nit -  a Date: header also needs to be changed.

Any objections?



On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:14 AM RFC Errata System <
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8040,
> "RESTCONF Protocol".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5633
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Qin WU <bill.wu@huawei.com>
>
> Section: B.2.2.
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>       PATCH /restconf/data/example-jukebox:jukebox/\
>           library/artist=Foo%20Fighters/album=Wasting%20Light/\
>           genre HTTP/1.1
>       Host: example.com
>       If-Unmodified-Since: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:56:30 GMT
>       Content-Type: application/yang-data+json
>
>       { "example-jukebox:genre" : "example-jukebox:alternative" }
>
>    In this example, the datastore resource has changed since the time
>    specified in the "If-Unmodified-Since" header.  The server might
>    respond as follows:
>
>       HTTP/1.1 412 Precondition Failed
>       Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:56:30 GMT
>       Server: example-server
>       Last-Modified: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:41:00 GMT
>       ETag: "b34aed893a4c"
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>       PATCH /restconf/data/example-jukebox:jukebox/\
>           library/artist=Foo%20Fighters/album=Wasting%20Light/\
>           genre HTTP/1.1
>       Host: example.com
>       If-Unmodified-Since: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:56:30 GMT
>       Content-Type: application/yang-data+json
>
>       { "example-jukebox:genre" : "example-jukebox:alternative" }
>
>    In this example, the datastore resource has changed since the time
>    specified in the "If-Unmodified-Since" header.  The server might
>    respond as follows:
>
>       HTTP/1.1 412 Precondition Failed
>       Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:56:30 GMT
>       Server: example-server
>       Last-Modified: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:57:10 GMT
>       ETag: "b34aed893a4c"
>
>
> Notes
> -----
> The date in the Last-Modified field of the response HTTP header should be
> greater than the date in the If-Unmodified-Since field of the request HTTP
> header.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8040 (draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-18)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : RESTCONF Protocol
> Publication Date    : January 2017
> Author(s)           : A. Bierman, M. Bjorklund, K. Watsen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Network Configuration
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

[netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040 (56… RFC Errata System
Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040… Ignas Bagdonas
Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040… Andy Bierman