[Netconf] Reminder: Action by Dec 20th 2013 PLEASE: Draft charter after consensus call

"Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net> Wed, 18 December 2013 10:39 UTC

Return-Path: <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDC11ADFD5 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 02:39:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GLmJkRftnrTt for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 02:39:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from koko.ripe.net (koko.ripe.net [193.0.19.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FEE21AE143 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 02:39:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nene.ripe.net ([193.0.23.10]) by koko.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bertietf@bwijnen.net>) id 1VtEXY-0003ar-MQ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:39:46 +0100
Received: from kitten.ipv6.ripe.net ([2001:67c:2e8:1::c100:1f0] helo=guest39.guestnet.ripe.net) by nene.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bertietf@bwijnen.net>) id 1VtEXY-00015m-K3; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:39:44 +0100
Message-ID: <52B17B74.1050200@bwijnen.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:39:48 +0100
From: "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
References: <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F8227417@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F8227417@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: --
X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: -2.9 points pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------ -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000]
X-RIPE-Signature: 86ab03e524994f79ca2c75a176445dd4bf767d13ea6842823138ccf6b38ad386
Subject: [Netconf] Reminder: Action by Dec 20th 2013 PLEASE: Draft charter after consensus call
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:39:50 -0000

We've had many emails on our WG mailing list, so maybe this one
did escape your attention. Please let us (WG hcairs) know if you
have any issues with this draft new WG charter. If we do not hear
any by Dec 20th, we will pss it to our AD for approval by th IESG.

It is always nice to hear that WG participants do agree too!

Bert and Mehmet

On 12/11/13 2:56 PM, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich) wrote:
> Dear NETCONF WG,
> we had two consensus calls ended on December 4, 2013.
>
>   * Verifing session consensus with the maillist on RFC5539bis new port and YANG module separation
>     _http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/current/msg08445.html_
>   * Verifing session consensus on RESTCONF as WG item with the maillist
>     _http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/current/msg08444.html_
>
> The co-chairs think that there was support for the action points and no objections to the consensus from the Vancouver NETCONF session.
> We think we can go one step further.The co-chairs agreed to have Reverse SSH as a separate document for the time being.
> Below is the relevant part of the draft charter. Please comment by December 20, 2013 EOB PT.
> We will then pass it on to our AD for approval by IESG.
> Bert & Mehmet
> ---------------
>    In the current phase of NETCONF's incremental development the workgroup
>    will focus on following items:
>    1. Develop the call home mechanism for the mandatory SSH binding (Reverse
>    SSH) providing a server-initiated session establishment.
>    2. Advance NETCONF over TLS to be in-line with NETCONF 1.1 (i.e., update
>    RFC 5539) and add the call home mechanism to provide a server-initiated
>    session establishment.
>    3. Combine the server configuration data models from Reverse SSH and
>    RFC5539bis drafts in a separate YANG module.
>    4. Develop a RESTful protocol (RESTCONF) that provides a programmatic
>    interface for accessing data defined in YANG, using the datastores
>    defined in NETCONF. The two parts concerning RESTCONF protocol over
>    HTTP and the YANG patch operation will be prepared in separate drafts.
> Goals and Milestones:
>    Jan 2014 - Submit initial WG drafts for RESTCONF as WG item
>    Apr 2014 - WGLC for RFC5539bis
>    Apr 2014 - WGLC for Reverse SSH
>    Apr 2014 - WGLC for NETCONF server configuration data model
>    May 2014 - Submit Reverse SSH to AD/IESG for consideration as Proposed Standard
>    May 2014 - Submit RFC5539bis to AD/IESG for consideration as Proposed Standard
>    Jun 2014 - WGLC for RESTCONF
>    Aug 2014 - Submit RESTCONF to AD/IESG for consideration as Proposed Standard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>