[netconf] [Errata Rejected] RFC8040 (5565)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 23 October 2019 21:45 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CAB120106; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id buLGXRRy_6Fx; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1069120100; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7CFB9F40740; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: bill.wu@huawei.com, andy@yumaworks.com, mbj@tail-f.com, kwatsen@juniper.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ibagdona@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20191023214537.7CFB9F40740@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:45:37 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/Ym7jItBIfy5sfC5aHn7iJaaU85o>
Subject: [netconf] [Errata Rejected] RFC8040 (5565)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 21:45:43 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC8040, "RESTCONF Protocol". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5565 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Date Reported: 2018-12-03 Rejected by: Ignas Bagdonas (IESG) Section: 7 Original Text ------------- +-------------------------+------------------+ | error-tag | status code | +-------------------------+------------------+ | in-use | 409 | | lock-denied | 409 | | resource-denied | 409 | | data-exists | 409 | | data-missing | 409 | Corrected Text -------------- +-------------------------+------------------+ | error-tag | status code | +-------------------------+------------------+ | in-use | 409 | | lock-denied | 409 | | resource-denied | 409 | | data-exists | 409 | | data-missing | 404 | Notes ----- The <error-tag> data missing should be mapped to status code '404' instead of '409' to get consistent with the defintion of data-missing in RFC6241. --VERIFIER NOTES-- Rejected based on WG discussion: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/XfoOpKslbdbGbX8HZrQHtNRvVkw -------------------------------------- RFC8040 (draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-18) -------------------------------------- Title : RESTCONF Protocol Publication Date : January 2017 Author(s) : A. Bierman, M. Bjorklund, K. Watsen Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Configuration Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [netconf] [Errata Rejected] RFC8040 (5565) RFC Errata System