[netconf] Re: Adoption call for quic-netconf-over-quic-06

Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com> Thu, 22 August 2024 06:51 UTC

Return-Path: <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADBBC169412 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 23:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.841
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.841 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=foxmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XDJFTrVq9tqV for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 23:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out203-205-221-245.mail.qq.com (out203-205-221-245.mail.qq.com [203.205.221.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7B00C15199A for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 23:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foxmail.com; s=s201512; t=1724309483; bh=RtH6ngWX+NyBesp1OTnwnqZqvhdhKej8Flbzf91eYgc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References; b=jb/mYkr6IobYJi4LE+tdkyftxPw2sDPLXE4A+qHlsfOCUTUkNDIvtJGL7t+9XIhpI 2l8y4xh4FnnhlXL0xNysMz4l06U9UuzvdfCIP6UGeVwsaX8ZCNKmDhxPkkNa4ItSnB bqzlOxr7+74kiYGJCyNPO+AzbNjrYsQK02XpCBWw=
Received: from LAPTOP-BOBOCIFS ([124.127.221.200]) by newxmesmtplogicsvrszc13-0.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP id CD583C69; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:51:21 +0800
X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1724309481t98p3uaea
Message-ID: <tencent_EEBC42EFFC85EB40C0380E3FB3BCD8D64A07@qq.com>
X-QQ-XMAILINFO: NhUkPfKlCtQwTxsoX6hyOoL746IZR54t/d/DWz+tUYbv00y0DEVi0jFGn23AXf 3diSlDlE0EJwnXSGFgNJ4l2+dtQ0od5U4m1gld4jCTJ8ThJP7cxijCVqWs2LY7aT/4o08e5/fLtU GtEjFLURUBitygNzwYtMCwv7+JJIQaQ2PHNXEOEmM7zXVtD/FbnvVgeUW6VlYd5msAXOENoyDYrK +e4zFsComatWXBuZ82KcmdOUj44Rub2//TlZ8k+GbVUoUq1qLzim0M7sJIbPGC6gE5gQEAG84KCn PzQCWTIXprMYDRVHwMoPUh6EOO1kHhZByi5gZf0U5PcPUM11doeQrpPgMIpby451qmxuLdA8hvTy b44Pxs2X36B//C4Xj8uNpPDlS5kEicKHH9gpf0Ym3qyO811PYKvU6Epab8G14Y4d4PbI/MNk8lk+ m5Hcppys9G9lwqfo7PNxNy6FI1pW8YJL1uIIou7waAHATCidrVFhVIGTPC1mRr9X4s/y512jcDYK 2fHwsu48CEAJWRmiv2xBsG5Jb2FxbKwCe+v3us8b2PTKeaLGlw6yFF1CS66B0veo65U3gLJ1OEvv m7bNtoKznnXmIEK+fwGdNjQ9oLuUMzx6e0r0KSxE3KG9pVHaCWzHxPaj9aAoaumymhOtaftnSf64 g3tjsP5EWWncBWf1muyzJNhfo0mXptbKzD1qLenoQuUfhhvtDmirSVNFffZ30gGQdrBG+gDeOB7a GRVBnqGK4YbDd9fwesmvOU1z9eGN4pagyYn1Ap/dLkVkGVcWgWY2d0YZuOyk2iIxRX72jWOqKqlX 9Qm7NspDuQnSZILa58ITj3EBRfprF29mLbn4/XU+fO/tpyni7w4bnBoBbsQ2sAopOar8m7jcLe2X 88wN5O/poI88VQZpVdT9aLtRyd8Gu4RcktNgr+HcaJ/7ub3hQEZlfPhxtummiawML8FLo8o9SyvQ J6aHFnXb2HxglAVfDA1SULZFrW2p75jhPGW7NNHD2Neic5kGyKoqNk4vkza6VKsHdlwTTwq/ojZH mOriouVvwsRYjExoP7ZN/iEFVnOqg=
X-QQ-XMRINFO: Mp0Kj//9VHAxr69bL5MkOOs=
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:51:22 +0800
From: Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com>
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
References: <0100019151cda6b9-99bdca9e-ec7f-443d-b792-2f0d606aff55-000000@email.amazonses.com>, <tencent_4E1D0A65F24BAE6D0069391ACCB8639F2A09@qq.com>, <C5839E45-2C48-4C80-BA82-F711367A6FCF@viagenie.ca>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: 6AA213A1-3F43-4F6E-A2C1-FC586AB563FA
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.25.306[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-OQ-MSGID: <2024082214512148232713@foxmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart471531633414_=----"
Message-ID-Hash: XQYKMZBKMSBCVR5F44V7IYP5ODDWM6QE
X-Message-ID-Hash: XQYKMZBKMSBCVR5F44V7IYP5ODDWM6QE
X-MailFrom: chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-netconf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [netconf] Re: Adoption call for quic-netconf-over-quic-06
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/l9dQda0gyua7iiG1npwG4Yd-Wt0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:netconf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netconf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netconf-leave@ietf.org>

Marc,

I think the approach in this draft is useful and support it adoption.  I also hope that the term of  NETCONFoQUIC is accurately used in it.  

Best regards
Chongfeng
 
From: Marc Blanchet
Date: 2024-08-19 10:21
To: Chongfeng Xie
CC: kent+ietf; netconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netconf] Adoption call for quic-netconf-over-quic-06


Le 18 août 2024 à 21:46, Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com> a écrit :

Hi Authors,

I have the following question about "NETCONFoQUIC" raised in the draft,

The abstract mentions that "This document describes  how to use NETCONF over the QUIC transport protocol, named NETCONFoQUIC."  But in section 7,  NETCONFoQUIC is shown as one type of protocol.  So my question is that whether NETCONFoQUIC is a kind of new protocol? If yes, what't the relationship of NETCONFoQUIC with NETCONF?

From TLS point of view, it is another protocol, therefore it is registered as an ALPN. All protocols over QUIC do the same.

Marc.


Best regards

Chongfeng

From: 【外部账号】Kent Watsen
Date: 2024-08-15 00:51
To: netconf@ietf.org
Subject: [netconf] Adoption call for quic-netconf-over-quic-06
NETCONF WG,

This message starts a two week poll on adopting the following document:

Using NETCONF over QUIC connection
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dai-netconf-quic-netconf-over-quic-06

The poll ends August 28.

Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support” or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.

FWIW, no IPR is known for this document:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/L9a1nQFdNuGH0rXZyEbd_RaN-UQ/

Kent  // as NETCONF WG chair

_______________________________________________
netconf mailing list -- netconf@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to netconf-leave@ietf.org