Re: [netconf] More capabilities for ietf-notification-capabilities (WGLC)

"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Wed, 09 October 2019 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139AF1208A5 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 09:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TRACKER_ID=0.1, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=E0gN+Cbu; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=bemIcmQk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dJgaRnGXRTqT for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 09:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DD291208DA for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 09:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13321; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1570637513; x=1571847113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=J5zfk5jYrKbsbsmms4T6f465L0I8jz5dojWqZyuJSu0=; b=E0gN+CbuqY9QZ5W1e29ZkOk5jqCa+uZbi6Zw85L58lSirk1E55XQR9D+ 77umbwoJ8pjYMUNOwvFmoF3WZYHnPXqZoKXkQgWGImPAUWZrHdyPseaeA yieYgeZzMsUJzQkTdC4ovkT8utXqax5h6qeeGrGM2Y/NsEJB7HGI5+qQT 8=;
X-Files: smime.p7s : 3975
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AVK2/Ex8Svr/v8P9uRHGN82YQeigqvan1NQcJ65?= =?us-ascii?q?0hzqhDabmn44+/bB7E/fs4iljPUM2b8P9Ch+fM+4HYEW0bqdfk0jgZdYBUER?= =?us-ascii?q?oMiMEYhQslVcObDkznBPXrdCc9Ws9FUQwt8g=3D=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AUAADNBZ5d/5pdJa1lGgEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQMBAQEBEQEBAQICAQEBAYFoBAEBAQELAYEbL1ADbVYgBAsqCodgA4pFTYI?= =?us-ascii?q?PkxyEYYEuFIEQA1QCBwEBAQkDAQEjCgIBAYRAAoJPIzUIDgIDAQMCAwEBBAE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQIBBQRthS0MhUsBAQEEEhsTAQE1Aw8CAQgRBAEBKAcCMBQJCAEBBAESCAY?= =?us-ascii?q?UgwGBHU0DHQECDKU3AoE4iGGCJ4J9AQEFhQcYghAHAwaBNAGBUoNDhngYgUA?= =?us-ascii?q?/gRFGgkw+gmEBAQIBgSsBEgEhFRYJgwqCJo0SiRiXHQqCIoNCgjAyZI4smUC?= =?us-ascii?q?OLYgikRQCBAIEBQIOAQEFgVMBN2dxcBU7gmxQEBSBT4NzhRSFP3QBgSiQd4E?= =?us-ascii?q?iAYEiAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,276,1566864000"; d="p7s'?scan'208,217";a="353700946"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 09 Oct 2019 16:11:52 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (xch-rcd-004.cisco.com [173.37.102.14]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x99GBqv7024579 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:11:52 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:11:51 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:11:50 -0500
Received: from NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 12:11:50 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ARBBG6CJ/dcsoTIH0C6cJraThKCb4uXkHA0bQwPL1YmRlJHA5ipDYBSalmEM8jCdr1v6z5Zmh/fmNHgAJi1o60ro3ZQGgH9kEhUAbAucr3Xg1zUR3Iy2bhmVh89AcyXWneimYLpciimMcgWWlL5IeF6Qjzfws7L2SgOxflG/ZlV0UC0aYQnENjPhQ7LZbfsXQYPHwhO0xYoq58eIPPSZMZRoicb/P1DO33VTtAdz0wwENtFVfm4FlTA2uxWBZ7odNltD3j73kZvHcBF2Qd3i4DKXzUAOLQYG8oACjDJbsFE5S4VsCiZKgncDKvqXvLwT3Svik2XZjpPT/3bzt5STQg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZI2++GZTuF/QVzAAiRLXDq6ZChdpVXqa4MSimS/ESuk=; b=JP4tNnvjcN+dARA4V96FEvOlGPSVeWlQKcnVm+gIszYM9qw9jyTbhrUCWNO52uQKh7YKgJX7MfUjL9t6FhJSuh5z6lZ+ie8PYBETYYLzRGFJRP6NAxRrtpTMn0+iQMUadt9x9Bn8MXv3UYk2M9bYaqKm10DOhTjYMRm8ha+9D6Ze9384b2+4FQ/5KDEcOEaqBSJuIopnO9TFnuvdlni/CkhakQNSel/70GZttDeQrWos/z9GU5CT0hO3vO9xc+yn0gZfBvs07Ya0b/8haWy+/xFOLAw/E6d/TjzyoaQgdOSaCurblxX09dmSI9goBH25Bs5ITHn2bBjt2N1MiQcPGg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZI2++GZTuF/QVzAAiRLXDq6ZChdpVXqa4MSimS/ESuk=; b=bemIcmQk9JOnTVapM+Zx5USm9nO6aKoUz092xlEFnjoWlbRz+hzJkVzv6Bvjz2nbPgT8heDGVqNI2yTLt7yd45aKTG4xW8k9v7+3J9L8We8dv5+7leemFjDEMPcHRPHM6kjRUZAuTnemTdDuymlGJtENb0Xw09wd30s8Y73du5A=
Received: from BN7PR11MB2627.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.255.31) by BN7PR11MB2612.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.246.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2347.16; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:11:49 +0000
Received: from BN7PR11MB2627.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f067:b6d2:8855:b605]) by BN7PR11MB2627.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f067:b6d2:8855:b605%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2347.016; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:11:49 +0000
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bal=E1zs_Lengyel?= <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>, Alexander Clemm <ludwig@clemm.org>, "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: More capabilities for ietf-notification-capabilities (WGLC)
Thread-Index: AdV+rn5v2Ucx0GJ9Tj2SEjVbMpaBTAAB6UTQ
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:11:49 +0000
Message-ID: <BN7PR11MB2627827C976F768A11DA9003A1950@BN7PR11MB2627.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <VI1PR0701MB22868DD351B416462CE90CEDF0950@VI1PR0701MB2286.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR0701MB22868DD351B416462CE90CEDF0950@VI1PR0701MB2286.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=evoit@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.117.86]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a0aa6e7d-88b8-4a44-324a-08d74cd363e4
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN7PR11MB2612:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN7PR11MB26120159F7BB8BD222310DF3A1950@BN7PR11MB2612.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7219;
x-forefront-prvs: 018577E36E
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(346002)(39860400002)(396003)(366004)(376002)(189003)(199004)(55016002)(66574012)(14444005)(478600001)(71190400001)(66066001)(99936001)(99286004)(71200400001)(81156014)(15650500001)(316002)(7696005)(8676002)(66446008)(2420400007)(2906002)(110136005)(81166006)(33656002)(256004)(26005)(6436002)(6506007)(8936002)(5660300002)(76176011)(64756008)(53546011)(6306002)(9686003)(236005)(66616009)(66476007)(66556008)(76116006)(186003)(54896002)(102836004)(66946007)(606006)(25786009)(86362001)(6116002)(6636002)(790700001)(966005)(229853002)(52536014)(6246003)(7110500001)(3846002)(14454004)(486006)(446003)(11346002)(476003)(7736002)(74316002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN7PR11MB2612; H:BN7PR11MB2627.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: vthvQRZ0CkNKVFrMiO2mKHymEBszGjs5XOzfdYYXhaBTDY3nlxyapoWy3/NtFYQtGp47oRPEQgUJPvmpGWDtSRlNPgNLdIWAwWhA/pFkEFoNdb5wy4yvY3J8IDa3ZFaqdEDJ1Jimjf0oSx1Mzc+XoTdTsbRuJhx4yfV47ZLJDh5gfo6aCRwLUeSZoh0ifJ7XsfVTPz/VyJzMM/wgvYRcyde9BlTsjXguAOyA1taGLt7aKDojOzJdMKbFhOAXcCvSw5qwtlrVRmyrxLYjBLCJyhmBjHFP3yWmFL56BzNmId0iE3Tjo7GaFWCEab30WSVrqMxE5AKDAWxWulpk76XbAZLipFQsBoX5BlbbXal2aAWBPPIFkV0RsskEemDNvqDxnQI72f/C4tz9vhvdLjRbTNOHF8IjOqDJ/9o0g3JvlSE=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_068E_01D57E9A.B8724EA0"; micalg=SHA1
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a0aa6e7d-88b8-4a44-324a-08d74cd363e4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Oct 2019 16:11:49.2265 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: R5IwLMcvHQ5SVqjtKGko0ytdlj4/3IV/VPS2Xgj/r96pCxX3yLNLMkBRWwDTfZOn
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN7PR11MB2612
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.14, xch-rcd-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/xyR3qXdA9ZAhPTgI4Hh0kYNEFs8>
Subject: Re: [netconf] More capabilities for ietf-notification-capabilities (WGLC)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 16:12:00 -0000

I have no objection to these additions.

 

Eric

 

From: Balázs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>; 
Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2019 10:33 AM
To: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>;; Alexander Clemm <ludwig@clemm.org>;; Eric
Voit (evoit) <evoit@cisco.com>;; Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>;
Subject: More capabilities for ietf-notification-capabilities (WGLC)

 

Hello,

During WGLC it was asked that  we could/should add some more capabilities to
the ietf-notification-capabilities model.

In https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8641#appendix-A.1 there are two more error
conditions mentioned.

cant-exclude 

datastore-not-subscribable

 

The publisher might be able to declare which change types can be used in the
leaf-list excluded-change 

The publisher might want to declare that not even periodic subscriptions are
supported for a specific datastore. Some people stated that supporting
periodic subscriptions is mandatory if RFC8641 (Yang-Push) is supported, so
we should not add this capability. But is it really mandatory to support
periodic subscriptions for e.g. the start-up datastore?

 

I intend to add these 2 to the model.

 

Opinions?

 

Regards Balazs

 

 

-- 

Balazs Lengyel                    Senior Specialist
Ericsson Hungary Ltd. 

Mobile: +36-70-330-7909              email: Balazs.Lengyel@ericsson.com
<mailto:Balazs.Lengyel@ericsson.com>