Re: [Nethistory] Need a change

"ian.peter@ianpeter.com" <ian.peter@ianpeter.com> Fri, 04 January 2019 05:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ian.peter@ianpeter.com>
X-Original-To: nethistory@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nethistory@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B271130F61 for <nethistory@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 21:05:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ianpeter.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qB1t-lhkJoxu for <nethistory@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 21:05:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from node171.myfcloud.com (li1827-163.members.linode.com [172.104.250.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 130B7130F39 for <nethistory@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 21:05:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ianpeter.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: Mime-Version:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Cc:Subject:To: From:Sender:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=L1MalmfgpIw5iQJJyLlAIH1ajFlGgGrjOM7ErGzQJVw=; b=BJdWhpZGpCQuWln0MwdBe1Zwmv f1xeV2BP4GkoaJWBcA1NmVxcooJKU5m6TEkcCHV0ECxE7yRFGt99eGcB5AWoafFdmzIsGMOSnuUWx S7WX/Gj4T+OVx8ilEzcoy1NiT0slkzP5A7kYINOB1LoX8QVuftOzrfntKdhMm4F6s8Ts=;
Received: from [110.147.130.144] (port=56213 helo=[192.168.0.3]) by node171.myfcloud.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <ian.peter@ianpeter.com>) id 1gfHg8-0005xF-BM; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 05:05:53 +0000
From: "ian.peter@ianpeter.com" <ian.peter@ianpeter.com>
To: "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "Scott Brim" <scott.brim@gmail.com>
Cc: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>, "Sanjeev Gupta" <ghane0@gmail.com>, "Elizabeth Feinler" <feinler@earthlink.net>, nethistory@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 05:04:18 +0000
Message-Id: <em1b5d704d-b4da-4338-ac81-7bab0ed59985@laptop-93l8qkek>
In-Reply-To: <892ddf9f-1ef6-0cf2-6e11-8b8db2c44265@gmail.com>
References: <585D8550-E15D-4CE5-AB43-C1C49DA233E3@earthlink.net> <CAHZk5WdmJK9Jb0-a+CSk+Gx27bPcHmNn87ThLwB_T2mgPz41vg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1901030818390.87828@ary.qy> <616ac103-736a-e64e-cb6a-6c3ee0dae9ae@gmail.com> <CAPv4CP8vc81jHPestayLpO1jACc0ah3Mm63UVKCHQez=d42YRg@mail.gmail.com> <892ddf9f-1ef6-0cf2-6e11-8b8db2c44265@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "ian.peter@ianpeter.com" <ian.peter@ianpeter.com>
User-Agent: eM_Client/7.2.34062.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - node171.myfcloud.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ianpeter.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: node171.myfcloud.com: authenticated_id: ian.peter@ianpeter.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: node171.myfcloud.com: ian.peter@ianpeter.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nethistory/HkS64mkNbM4mIS76EZ2UUpp2fhY>
Subject: Re: [Nethistory] Need a change
X-BeenThere: nethistory@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Matching net historical materials with institutions that may preserve them <nethistory.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nethistory>, <mailto:nethistory-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nethistory/>
List-Post: <mailto:nethistory@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nethistory-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nethistory>, <mailto:nethistory-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 05:05:58 -0000

While agreeing that the Internet Archive and the Computer History Museum 
could play useful roles, I think it might be best to continue efforts 
via the internethistory@postel.org list, rather than set up something 
new at this stage.

Thanks Jake for all your efforts, and all the best to you.

Ian Peter

------ Original Message ------
From: "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>;
To: "Scott Brim" <scott.brim@gmail.com>;
Cc: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>;; "Sanjeev Gupta" 
<ghane0@gmail.com>;; "Elizabeth Feinler" <feinler@earthlink.net>;; 
nethistory@ietf.org
Sent: 4/01/2019 3:31:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Nethistory] Need a change

>On 2019-01-04 17:15, Scott Brim wrote:
>>  Brian, what would you propose happen here? This list will not achieve
>>  critical mass (although I now remember the launch fondly). Take it to ISOC?
>
>I don't really have the ergs to do any more than make the suggestion,
>but yes, I think that would be a better next step than simply giving
>up. I would imagine that some sort of cooperation with the Internet
>Archive would be desirable. Also possibly with the Computer History
>Museum, if any old-fashioned paper with ink is involved.
>
>    Brian
>
>>
>>  On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 8:22 PM Brian E Carpenter <
>>  brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>; wrote:
>>
>>>  The only thing is, do we (for some value of "we") care about this?:
>>>
>>>>>>  raise the awareness of IETF members about saving important historical
>>>  archives and artifacts.
>>>
>>>  If we close the list, we're saying either that we (the IETF) don't care, or
>>>  that IETF people are already aware of the need to save stuff.
>>>
>>>  I do care, because I've worked a bit on the history of computing and I'm
>>>  very
>>>  much aware of the historical value of personal records, alongside official
>>>  sources. But whether this is worthy of IETF cycles is a separate question.
>>>  It seems like something that should perhaps be an ISOC topic.
>>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Nethistory mailing list
>Nethistory@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nethistory