IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] NBC or non-backwards-compatible

"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Thu, 06 June 2019 10:05 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B0C120137 for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 03:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.49
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.49 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=Cvx63iG+; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=YQVdRh2B
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ii3NeBc4CXyH for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 03:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C20ED12009E for <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 03:05:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10389; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1559815523; x=1561025123; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=kYZedxikxow/5XUahvqssqYG2PZ2ntdJTZkr/Wo+nqc=; b=Cvx63iG+wtgj0T32b8r4OTCVbelFfF7R0x1lM1KNOpFzo4bs49wmYDFt 9OyTUQlpzZgbAal+jO91CU2SgXLbBzqzg6BvEnWHufFBZWzy19hZ6wsFI K7vb7gmTNdNAZmpsGGAd+6Bxn/8vx1dA16Fxmz/3Ux9zp3kz4e3YdIGBP c=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:sCYfjRd3V8tIJssLOB+QIuwylGMj4e+mNxMJ6pchl7NFe7ii+JKnJkHE+PFxlwGRD57D5adCjOzb++D7VGoM7IzJkUhKcYcEFnpnwd4TgxRmBceEDUPhK/u/dTM7GNhFUndu/mqwNg5eH8OtL1A=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AXAAAE5Phc/4YNJK1mGwEBAQEDAQEBBwMBAQGBUQYBAQELAYEOL1ADalUgBAsoCodRA4RSigtKgg2SX4RSgS4UgRADVAkBAQEMAQEYAQoKAgEBg3pGAoJhIzQJDgEDAQEEAQECAQRtHAyFSgEBAQQBARAVBhMBASwMDwIBCBEEAQEoBycLFAkIAQEEARIIGoMBgR1NAx0BAgybSwKBOIhfgW8zH4JaAQEFhH4Ygg8DBoE0AYtaF4FAP4FXgkw+gmEBAYEuARIBISsJgwaCJpMOdYdEjVIJAoIOk1eXBI0OljACBAIEBQIOAQEFgU84Z3FwFTuCbIIPg3CFFIU/coEpjC2BIgGBIAEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,559,1557187200"; d="scan'208,217";a="568759525"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 06 Jun 2019 10:05:22 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-014.cisco.com (xch-rcd-014.cisco.com [173.37.102.24]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x56A5LPT017471 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 6 Jun 2019 10:05:22 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-RCD-014.cisco.com (173.37.102.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 05:05:21 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 05:05:20 -0500
Received: from NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 06:05:20 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9or3GtUnbHCOoD527tZZt8FLZYiVUsSJdf/puizwRe4=; b=YQVdRh2BenaoY03fTCIPoUc+CL5E1sASOVA8SwLVtHfdw4zMJHMK7WzB7hBtO+8+p4SlgMdr/WZp9kPHNPhYxPWtNPJKZalX9hISyeb+nNE3+pNM1PCAvcBLcZ5PiUfSKdG0rEbfS0C61UIdMhJzdGPAGclPmHW5Pqmm2gkZwFM=
Received: from BYAPR11MB2631.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.227.28) by BYAPR11MB2566.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.226.159) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1965.12; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 10:05:19 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB2631.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d837:c1dd:cdb1:bb78]) by BYAPR11MB2631.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d837:c1dd:cdb1:bb78%7]) with mapi id 15.20.1943.023; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 10:05:19 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: Balázs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>, "Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <jason.sterne@nokia.com>, "netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org" <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netmod-ver-dt] NBC or non-backwards-compatible
Thread-Index: AdUbulQ2zR2T4jPEThOSru8JbqNlmAAMzLgwABZLOIAAAiCggA==
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2019 10:05:18 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB2631EC6F8731AD2543484416B5170@BYAPR11MB2631.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BYAPR11MB263180E3C74E775032A68B74B5160@BYAPR11MB2631.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <VI1PR07MB3981D3B7C8100A71A531A6B19B160@VI1PR07MB3981.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <5bcfdd47-f7be-e4e3-cea9-ebe35c33cbd6@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <5bcfdd47-f7be-e4e3-cea9-ebe35c33cbd6@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rwilton@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.220.56]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a0add4e4-daf6-4100-55b8-08d6ea667af6
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR11MB2566;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB2566:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 3
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB2566FE0AE9A7785B0CCB42F1B5170@BYAPR11MB2566.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 00603B7EEF
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(39860400002)(366004)(346002)(396003)(376002)(136003)(189003)(199004)(8676002)(64756008)(52536014)(81156014)(33656002)(66476007)(66556008)(66446008)(5660300002)(2501003)(966005)(81166006)(476003)(486006)(8936002)(606006)(14454004)(66946007)(186003)(66066001)(26005)(6506007)(478600001)(99286004)(53546011)(229853002)(76176011)(102836004)(7696005)(3846002)(76116006)(6116002)(790700001)(2906002)(53936002)(74316002)(9686003)(110136005)(256004)(54896002)(6306002)(71190400001)(71200400001)(6436002)(236005)(6246003)(316002)(86362001)(7736002)(73956011)(11346002)(68736007)(446003)(25786009)(55016002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR11MB2566; H:BYAPR11MB2631.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: GL3EwsJle+bN4Rz7JsWmvUiluJ7hIErenPQM7Ng4FHILE/bMiywLBdhqTuLazlGBKcFwigPeROxon+6eNFvWZ9QEdmwkP6lB98UTqn8BK3tPJ7Js9DfIzoOKJMPNhxkf6Bm2uLQua+p+0WB7ci+SMwlH41TBCOkOz3HTYpKRahCbRAGmubwk9qxvTwqKwpmgkqf3Jejuxepcy3n8zKZICut1W/wIav6Aqj+AY+hjQB2q/FgyfSYhoFRf8QBoHg4W6Dj2MF5yZGXQtl5I4xfWP0njrO7CJdN8q08wYHrY55CJ/VV0lnnQP9sHY+d+SR0QSU/A165TIgR+jQ7hNyNnsA4EkbW94XQ99ng41dWJ98DygDUic2QPiugFyOjKbrhCae1q0e0fKxYsbe4aKJoNSrR2YurjingrsoGS735EglQ=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BYAPR11MB2631EC6F8731AD2543484416B5170BYAPR11MB2631namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a0add4e4-daf6-4100-55b8-08d6ea667af6
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Jun 2019 10:05:18.7713 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: rwilton@cisco.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB2566
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.24, xch-rcd-014.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod-ver-dt/ACY_RVSXp517z14ESGx2Sv02jg8>
Subject: Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] NBC or non-backwards-compatible
X-BeenThere: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NetMod WG YANG Model Versioning Design Team <netmod-ver-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod-ver-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2019 10:05:26 -0000

OK, I've added the RFC2119 boilerplate and BC and NBC definitions, and converted the ones that I thought appropriate to BC/NBC respectively.

Thanks,
Rob


From: Netmod-ver-dt <netmod-ver-dt-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Balázs Lengyel
Sent: 06 June 2019 10:03
To: Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) <jason.sterne@nokia.com>; Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>; netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] NBC or non-backwards-compatible


I Agree with Jason.

Balazs
On 2019. 06. 06. 0:26, Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) wrote:
My 2c -> I'd prefer NBC and BC all through the doc consistently. Then if we decide we really need to change later, it is a fairly rapid search-and-replace activity.

Readers will very rapidly acclimatize to NBC and BC when reading the doc.

From: Netmod-ver-dt <netmod-ver-dt-bounces@ietf.org><mailto:netmod-ver-dt-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2019 12:22 PM
To: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
Subject: [Netmod-ver-dt] NBC or non-backwards-compatible

Do you think that the draft should import/define "BC" and "NBC" and then solely use those terms throughout the document, or do you think that makes it less readable?

I have used the full expansion, but Reshad's section on guidelines (where the terms arise much more frequently) is using the acronyms.  The draft should be consistent, but not sure which direction is the best way to go.

Thanks,
Rob



_______________________________________________

Netmod-ver-dt mailing list

Netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org<mailto:Netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod-ver-dt

--

Balazs Lengyel                       Ericsson Hungary Ltd.

Senior Specialist

Mobile: +36-70-330-7909              email: Balazs.Lengyel@ericsson.com<mailto:Balazs.Lengyel@ericsson.com>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email