[netmod] Issue in example of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07

Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com> Fri, 05 April 2019 11:11 UTC

Return-Path: <rohitrranade@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA451203D0 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 04:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 96p_5Vo6YrgB for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 04:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAA6E1203BE for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 04:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 92B1139EA6A0EB45B00B for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 12:11:05 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.53) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 12:11:05 +0100
Received: from lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.53) by lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 12:11:05 +0100
Received: from DGGEML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.49) by lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 12:11:04 +0100
Received: from DGGEML510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.113]) by dggeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.3.17.49]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 19:10:53 +0800
From: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Issue in example of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07
Thread-Index: AdTrn0uSWYZcRs5YRCOybzFrujCrmg==
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 11:10:52 +0000
Message-ID: <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BD36D8D@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.150.121]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BD36D8Ddggeml510mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/-RsjmXwcV79YWB9rqtDgOZzFBh8>
Subject: [netmod] Issue in example of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 11:11:10 -0000

Hi,

In https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07#appendix-A,


The following is a fictional example result from a query of the

   module tags list.  For the sake of brevity only a few module results

   are imagined.

<ns0:config xmlns:ns0="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0">
  <t:module-tags xmlns:t="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-module-tags">
::

</t:module-tags>

</ns0:config>

The "config" should be replaced with "data", as the result of a query will have "data" node.
We can also add that it is fictional NETCONF example result.

With Regards,
Rohit