IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 02 November 2016 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261241295F2; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 06:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zAfnHZUYzuzI; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 06:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5F041294CA; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 06:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=533; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1478095104; x=1479304704; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YP8SgsqyX+Z0pKczQGyw2O5nHSJ1la0T7S2z71rdN5Q=; b=Ig5H9HZUvcElxbMn09SBbGXPTeJWel993mH/8wLfMQ3EK8VhxxchroPW Es5FMOfY3NP59Bc+6un6Ao9NS1/IKwgxzMrw3FG7MyEgsGEbgkvGh4B7e lsNwbrlaAIQmFxn+wKKLIWqf5ZvhaGxm0fM+fHixcEWit5SPbKcFfw8aj U=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,583,1473120000"; d="scan'208";a="649636533"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Nov 2016 13:58:22 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uA2DwLLE016570; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:58:21 GMT
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, "draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg.all@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <147803154180.23820.9214684669050491573.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D43E7868.8712E%acee@cisco.com> <7EEAE7E3-906D-4FED-B4BF-0BA44452E7E9@nostrum.com> <D43EAEFE.87354%acee@cisco.com> <CCC88E65-A698-4881-99A4-8F98451E11B4@nic.cz> <D43F43E3.87400%acee@cisco.com> <20161102122504.GA47725@elstar.local>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <21ece9c1-5167-64c6-7659-9ff86419b0b0@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 14:58:21 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161102122504.GA47725@elstar.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/2boHP3KAqR_dhwSwAwyIqOWnG0A>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 13:58:26 -0000

On 11/2/2016 1:25 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 11:21:30AM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>> Yes - that’s what I meant. I’d vote to make them both informative as in
>> RFC 7223 - especially with the trend to use YANG with different transport
>> protocols.
>>
> NACM should be transport independent; if it is not, we need to fix
> that.  That said, I agree that references to NETCONF or NACM should be
> informative and not normative, like in RFC 7223.
Agreed.

Regards, B.
>
> /js
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email