Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: (with DISCUSS)

[Alissa Cooper <[e-mail]>]

> On Apr 10, 2019, at 9:45 PM, Adam Roach via Datatracker <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This is a "discuss discuss" that I plan to clear once the IESG has considered
> the topic during tomorrow's telechat.
> 
> This document has a normative reference to RFC 8199, which is informational.
> This downref was not mentioned in the IETF Last Call announcement
> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>, and RFC 8199 doesn't
> yet appear in the downref registry <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/downref/>.
> 
> Per RFC 8067, this doesn't require running another IETF last call; however, as
> it wasn't part of the IETF last call discussion, the IESG is required to
> evaluate whether the downref is appropriate.

This change was made in the latest version in response to the Gen-ART review. I think the reference is appropriate and I don’t think another last call is required.

Alissa

> 
> 
> 
>