Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: (with DISCUSS)

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 11 April 2019 12:40 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0384912028A; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 05:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=VKkndmz3; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=bpgD9Z5v
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7guAIs-BuSHW; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 05:40:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95DD9120670; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 05:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9233824438; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:40:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:40:32 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=p U1jAXtbkONx/tfsQUhnCSUaWaKQszXwT9yh3pf3Gsg=; b=VKkndmz3Sr90/LFUO 0dcBR63FEdg+iNm/gzWAp7q+fCsSJXkcXhp7ebhJKY/ZDBaGbMO74/wUKiUCpg1y IJLLbwGIquZDNbmfIw7QaWU7zuKUyWcQKqfXTfluoq6CDp33ShBFuyUQUJYkkavy 0v7mWtaag9pQik2weNhBilUXoe4tbLcMJ0SHVzGTdDbbQh8jcocgvX+XbOqRoiQZ VHl/Xal4mwVoJXSYyvIVRIphUXo+ChVE3apfLSKchqRH99F3kyneggDtyNIDEzwm i+NBUv+4j2MULzdy/F2c0y5f7REkp7Kf6RbTX6xthL1vyolB/nov7S23uos/vZL0 uBtCA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=pU1jAXtbkONx/tfsQUhnCSUaWaKQszXwT9yh3pf3G sg=; b=bpgD9Z5vqE/mV+WaefgAQLsvb6bbIYBUsbd129kEEzy9b+LKDIKdj/5ob AjMsUmNyJsCGudOTvrwykp3bWkgfjy3T52nwZoNOQuyk/+32+DyGSX8sP29B2Ays N/R0IVbNx1xAdk5D+07xF52ISlm9YwxrCgOPoz8O8f/vsUhkS39rMVo/syrAYgPP fMYoT7LwAneqmdK+h/fFSgSUOoeQXlTNY3SrCEYZ20dCAmkXG4/JGMqAUDnyaJe/ iBnzqYHabuwes18Idvk0QWZdLiLGJPGdf1+Y/stnGdx5rPAND/2avc7gHV7TxsIq jY1UTAVS+nng7BPBD8G3+EYPHUumw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:wDWvXICZ4ptopjYAmXjYdM09a9dgnUhovnmprUMak_Vj4qlwQFuzqA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrudelgdehhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhs rgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuffhomhgrih hnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepudejfedrfeekrdduudejrdekjeenucfrrghrrghm pehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinhenucevlhhushhtvg hrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:wDWvXASksKpCL56dByZclQh5VYPpD5rdPfGrtsmzArfgG4d1RmsWqw> <xmx:wDWvXJq8ROg8b8IFqQOXsLVLxCeomLBQuBanpfvJQ7_vm_yldy2c-g> <xmx:wDWvXJWQwhknyXUEYFKGeqrgA6Bd9SLx9XvBS8wzMoDpZeQ99uMGXg> <xmx:wDWvXPDzFGMzNQsZroHeEzP6j0PRt5U0YPatM-y0KYMyem3pQewkcg>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro5.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.87]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AF9BB10310; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:40:31 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <155494713179.22720.11773577974446143093.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:40:30 -0400
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, joelja@gmail.com, draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F35B7927-F27D-452C-948A-C81F59E0C27F@cooperw.in>
References: <155494713179.22720.11773577974446143093.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/E9IREJGoaaEqZO_1dMFkgvwpyuI>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 12:40:39 -0000


> On Apr 10, 2019, at 9:45 PM, Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>; wrote:
> 
> Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-07: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This is a "discuss discuss" that I plan to clear once the IESG has considered
> the topic during tomorrow's telechat.
> 
> This document has a normative reference to RFC 8199, which is informational.
> This downref was not mentioned in the IETF Last Call announcement
> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/>;, and RFC 8199 doesn't
> yet appear in the downref registry <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/downref/>;.
> 
> Per RFC 8067, this doesn't require running another IETF last call; however, as
> it wasn't part of the IETF last call discussion, the IESG is required to
> evaluate whether the downref is appropriate.

This change was made in the latest version in response to the Gen-ART review. I think the reference is appropriate and I don’t think another last call is required.

Alissa

> 
> 
> 
>